dismissed EB-3 Case: Software Engineering
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the beneficiary did not meet the specific educational requirements listed on the certified labor application (Form ETA 750). The position required a Bachelor of Science degree in Computer Science, which the beneficiary did not possess. The AAO affirmed that USCIS is bound by the explicit requirements of the labor certification and that the beneficiary's combination of other education and experience was insufficient to meet this mandatory requirement.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
'US. Citizenship
and Immigration
Services
PETIT%ON: Imn~igrar~t peiilion for Alien iVolkerr as a Skilled Worker or $'rofessionai purs~ant to
Section ^IO:".ilb)43) of rhe Imn-tjgrafion and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.V. fj 1 1 S.;(b)(3)
.- .
Ihis 3s the decision oi'trle i%dinlr:istrative tlppi.als Office in your case. All documents have been returtled to
the office Illat originall:; decided jio?ir case. Any fitrlt~er inyui~y n:ust be made to Q~ai ofllce.
DISCUSSION: 'I'he preference visa priitii311 %'a:: &:-tied by the Director, Califc,r!~ia Srrl~ice Center, and is
iiow before the Admjnistratii/e Appeals Ofiice (A.A(:)) on appeal. The appeal will be dismissed.
The petitioner is a teiecommunication tesriiig. eqiipment ~aalsiifacturer. It seeks to ernploy ihe beneficial?;
permarnenl1y in the United States as a sofiivase engineer. As -reqilired by statute, a Fonn ETA 750,
Appijcatican for Alien Ernployrt~erii Certi5cat;on approtred by tile Department of T..abor accon?parzies ik
petition. The director deiennirred that 81e petiticrner had not established that the beneficla3-y has tlie college
degr-er required by tlx preference classificatic.1-I for whicl: the Alien Ernploynlerii Certification accon-tjjalzying
the petition specified and denied the pcssitio:~ accordii:gly.
On appea;, the cnunsel si~brnits a brief.
Section 2(53(b)(:3)(A)(i) of the Act, 8 1i.S.C. 9 1153(b)(3)(AB(i). prrsvides for gai:ting preference
classifica~ion to qualiikxl inrmigs-slits who ;Ire capable; at [he lime of petiiicming for ciassit:catinn unde~ this
pal-aqaph, of perfornlii~g skijled jabor (requiring at least two years lrairling or expcri~ncs). not of a ts!-nporarry
nature, for which q~salified vy.oskers are i:ot available in the United States.
Tbc regulation at 8 CIX 5 204.50)(3)(ii) statrs, in pertinent pat:
(A) C~ncval. Any req~tirei~ients oi'trainirrg tlrl- expel-ience fix- skilled workers, professionals, or
other- wor'kers nzust be supported by letters frrrm trainers or employers giving the nanie, address,
and tlrle of the trainer or employer, and a ilescriptiora sf the trainir~g received or tlie experience of
the al icn .
(B) ,SA:iIIipd uujha:r. If the petition is $?.?r- a sklled worker, the petition inirst he accompanied by
evide~lce that the alien meets the educational, training or experience. and any other requirense~zts
of the iridividr.ral lalmr cer-tificatirjn, meets the requirerrients for Schedule A desigxation, or- n:.eets
the requirerneilts fbr the Z,abor Market Infc~mation Piloi Proganl bsccspal-ion designation. 'The
rnir~irrruiri reyaiiements for this classification are a: lease two years oftraining or experiel~cs.
Section 203(b)(3)(A)(ii] 01 tile Iinn~igration 2nd Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. $ 13;53(b)(3)(A)(i!:)*
~~rovides for granting ?reference classiticarior! to qualified in~migranis who hold baccalaureate degrees aild
are mrrnl~er!: of the pr,rofessions.
The regtrlr-lllc~n a? 8 C.F.R. 3 304.5(1)(2) Ltales, 1rl perlirrzrlt parr:
"Prq(';ssiorra/ means a qilalified alien who holds ai least a United; States bacca?:aureate degree
crr a iilreiF eqcri-vaierit degree and 5vho is a n~en~her ofthe pr~fessinns."
'T'he i.egu1atio11 at 8 C.F.R. 3 204.5(I)(3)(ii)(C) states, rn pei"rinent j?,?rt:
P3rqfissiirnciis.
Tf the peti.iion is for a pri?fessional, tile petition must he sccor~ganied by
evidence that the alien holds a kiniteci States bacca1a:lreate degree or a foreign equivalent
degree ai:d by evideizce that the alien is a rnetnixr of the pmfessicms. Evidence of ;i
baccaiaiireate degree shall be in Qlc: form of an csffj'ricial college or university record showing
tlie date the baccalrireate degree was awarded and the area of ccrnccntratiun of sttldy.
If the petlition is for a p~cstkssjonal pursuanc to 8 C.F.R.$204.5jl), then, the petitioner rrrusi dernonstt-ate that
the beneficiary received a United States bsc~aliiureate degree or m equivalent foreign degree prior to the
prionty date, :he day the For-n~ E'YA 756 ivas ziccepted fbr pi-ocessing by aiiy office within the einployment
systen-r of fbe Ueparcment of Labor, Here, tlx Porn7 ETA 7% was accepted fbr processing on Septerrlhes 10.
2001. The petrtioner selected in Part 2, box *'e" (sf ihe 1-130 pelidan. That selecticrr~ states, ".A skilled worker
...
(requiring ar least two years ctf specialized traini-ng or experience) or prvfessioiraI
."
'1'0 determine u,lretf-lcr a Irrcncficiary is eiih5bie for ai; emplop~ent based i~rmiqant visa, Citizenship &
Iln,ri~ip-arion Services (CIS) musf cxa~nisle whether the alien's. credentials meet the requirements set fbit1-1 in the
labor ceriificatiorr. In ervaluating the beneficiary's qu;difications, CIS nnusr: look to the job offer porticrri ofthe
labor ccrlificai3on I<? deiennine thr required qriaiificslions for the pusitim:. CIS nray not jpore 3 tern? of the
labor ccriificatri?n; nix may it inxpose additronal requirements, See d.fafte.r qf' Sbl'~vr Drag-on C'hijlms
deslu~trcxni, 19 l&N 19ec. 4631. 406 (Cotrun. !,986). .%a: nl.co. !Wrndunj. v. Srnl'ih, 696 F.2d 1008, {D.i'. Cir.
1953 ); K.R.K. k:j/.~i!z~, kc. 1'. La~zdon: 699 F.26 I006 (9th GI-. 1983): S~e~i,ar-~ hJi-a-Red 4_i,mp~:i.~,s.ar~r ?f'
i2fassac*hirsett.s, Ittc. 31. 6komey. 661 F.2d I {l si Cir. 198 1).
In the insai:t case, Forn-r E'T'A 750 :9; iiem 14 describes the reyni~-emcrzts of the pro-f'fered position ad occupatio~
of sr?i-lx~fare engineer as follows:
1 4.
Edtlcaiio-n {el~tcr nuniber of y ears) ............... C .,
jr dJe School .... C
a-Iigt1 School c:
Cojiege - c:
College Degree Required
-- Bacl.lelc:~r of ..................... Science
Majcx Fieid of Study
C:oinpilter S.1cikg.~
'I'rainlng Blank
Experience ..................
Job Offered ..................
N~it~?.ber -Years Mos. - I :'0
R.elati.d Occupation ..................
N:lnlbt:r -Yeas Mas. Blank
Related Occupation ... ..................
Specjt:). LZl3;nk
'I'lr empjoyer who is the pe:itio~ner has pl-ep::re~l the ahc'.ve ETA 750 it as an essel~tial part sf 5-te labor
cenificaflcx-t process used to suypoi~ a preference visa putition that is ernpio!in:erit based. 'I'he emplnyer who
desires to employ an alien in the United States rnust undertake a multiple siep process as directed by the
iinited Statrs Deparf;rner:t of Labor v,41ich, once approved? ccrtifks the Alien Employment AppIicatioz for the
occupatir:tn based :>pan the above criieria. In the prrsent case, the above requiremenis also state that the
occupation o:'soft~~are engineer has a coilepe degee c>r its equivalent, in the ~onzputer science field.
Along with Form ETA 750, I'ag ?-I, set forth above, tize employer also is required to submit Fom-r E'l'h 750,
Fan B illat is a "Sutierrren: of Qi~alificatinrts of Alien." Part HS ideritit',es the alien. specifjss his current and
prospective adclrrss ii: thc I.?nited States, his educaiion includir~g irade and vocation training; and lists his
work experiesce.
'The Fonn ETA 750 F3art B prepared by the berieiiciary states the follosving educzition history:
%31ock 1 i
Nalnes and Addresses of Schoois, C:'cjlleges, and Universities Attended
(including trade or s~ocatiotlai
trajniijg facilities)
&&-~!!g.j:!.S1!>jyg!::i.ty, Seoul, Kcrreri
Field of St~idy
From . . . [rno.b<[
'Yo . . ~ [3no,/yT.j
Drgrees crr CertiRcates Receivcd
E.jg!r%-g?_cs Engineering
MAR 1990
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FEB 1.99.6
U.S. EIt.ct.r:~~jc.s..E.ng~i~eg~:~;":g
Field of St~rdy
From . . . [1-r1o.:'::rj
To . . . [rrio./yr-,j
Degrees or Certificates Received
i.'omputer Info Svsterns
AUG ... 1039
IAN 2000
. . . - . - . . . . --
D:)iAk!!nn Prouarn Certificate
The petitioner su'omiged ar: education evaluation rei_zor2 rnentio~led below, and. counsel prc~vided a descriptlorl
of the berreficiary's relevartrl ~ndustry experience as of' Ole priority date.
On appeal counsel prcrrvidcd copies of the following di?curnents as additional evidence: a legal brief; the
beneficiary's resurne; a translated summary of SQ Techrrolugics' Ltd. ~.;leb page; verification of empioyrnent
of the beneficiary by SQ Technologies l.,td.; the beneficiary's certiiicatc of career uiitj-t SQ 'T'echnologies'
I.td.; CIS Notice of Action crlucumcnts rclafeci to the beneficiary's temporary worker status; a copy of' the
i>eneficiarj's visa; ;m educaiioilai evaluat~on report dated February 14. 2005, by the Fo;miiation Icjr
Internntionil Services Tnc.; the bei-reticinry's educational tran::cripts; arid, Oracle br-oficiency certificates fi>r
training.
As tnentioncd. Qxe drrecror deterrnirlest 1h2t the pztitioner I:ait .not established tkir the bmei'iciary l-rad thc
college degree required I>y the pref'erence ciassification for which the Alien Ernploynrent Certification
accornparryir~g the petition specified and deriied the position accordingly on January 5,2005.
On ap~regl, the co~~rrisel asserts that the bentSj"jcary's combined ?r-ofessioi:al experience and educarionol
bnckground equates to a Uacileior's degree in cornpuler si:ier:cc. Counsel raises an issue concerning
'kpparent inconsistencies in dates of education and work experierlce but this issue was not ralsed in ihe
dir-ectol-'s decision and it will not bc discussed here.
Fetiticrner's clear intent is expressed in ihe certified :liirn'E;qpinyn~ent Application. A bachelor's of science
college degree is requii-ed in the computer science iield Gf study. Note that even if this petitivrs were
consideresl undcr thr skilied worker replaaions, rhc rl-sr!It xvouid he thc same. !ti-hile it is clear that
regulations governing the skilled worker ciassiikation do not contain a baccalaureate. degree requiren~ent, GTS
is still bound by the regulaticjns a:.id ;!hove-cited case law to require the petitiiwer arrcl berreficiary to n~eei the
reo,irire~ae~-tfs specified on the ETA-758. 5'ts;cie 8 C.F.fP. $ 204.5 (i')(?j(iij!B). Regardless of clnssification, the
E'J'A-750 colltains the requirerrrents that tf:e i>eneficiary must have a bachelctr's of science college degree is
I-equired ii: the coinputer scicilce tiel d of study.
Page 5
'T'ke petitiorrer st~bnritteci an educationai evaluation report cSated Febrtra~y 14, 2005. by r11e Fo~mdltlioi~ for
Il-rterrlarionctl Services Inc., of lhe beneficia-v's foreis schooling and educat-in!: rect:ivc.d in the tinired States
as it equates tn a I-iighcr educatjon offered in the United States. The evaluation stated 11-i pertinent part:
Vhe beneficiary] has the eq~i~ialerzt of a bachelor's degree in electrical engineering wit11 a
speciai~zaiion in electronics ti-om . . . a university iil the United Staies and has, as a res~tlt c~rf
his educatior~al background aid e~npioynzeni experiences (3 years of esperience =: I year of
utli1;crarty-level credit)? an educational hackground the equivaleilt of 311 il~dividfilal with a
bache!or's degree in ccampter science fron-r . . . [an] unis.ersity iin the United States.
'Xhe subjec: Fon!~ E'B'A 750 Part A requires a degree fiom a c~>ilege and Bre co~npletion of baccalaureate of
scit-ce studies in crsn1put.e:- scimce. CIS regulatioi~s do PIO~ provide that a corribinatirsn of ed~rcation and
experience may be acceptect in lieu of a fbur-year degree. While .the regularion ai 8 C.F.IZ. 9 204.5(1)(3)(ii)(Hj
cto stare that the "relevani post secc?rzdary education may be considered as trairrirrg for the purposes of tlns
paragmph;" there is no regulation that vQ.ould aliow for a con-\iel-se, that the experience may be ccsnsidered fc~r
edrication reyuire~nerits.
CZS may, ~n its discreticsn, use as advisor-); opinions, statements sribnlltieit as expert testimorry. 1-$o:vever,
wl-iere a11 opinion is not i;n accord wit11 0th~~ infom-ration or is ir: sty way quest-ionable, CIS is not recluirecl to
accept or may give less eight to tlsat evidence. il,ff~l:er Q/' C'clrou Intenrclrionul, 19 I&N Dec. 791 QCornm.
1988). In this i~slance, by petitioiler's credential evalu;itor, the bcneilciary has the cyuivalent of a bachelor's
degree ii: electrical engineering {viih a specialization in eleciroriics froi-n . . . a university in the IJniied Stares.
This matter is noi in dispute.
1-lowever, CIS and the hhQ does not accept the evaluator's fi-irttrer opinion tl:at a clmzbination of education
and expt-r-ir-nce equate "to a bachelors of' science degree in crjnlputer science as, that is ". . . a result of his
educational backgroui~d and en~ployrnent PY~~I-iences (3 years ctP experience = I year of university-lexiel
credit). a:; educational backgourrd d~e equivalent of an individual with a backelnr's de~ee in computer
science frol-n . . . [a111 imiversity in the United States."
C.:ounsel cortk::d,i tbal job experience together with the above mentioned diplorrra course take11 at- the ItJniversity
of California at Ber-kley satisfjes the educatiorral requirenzent i'csr the preference catego~y. Z)espiie counsel's
arg~~nzents, CIS will not accept a degree eq~iivalei~cy wher: a labor certification plainly XII~ expressly requires a
.Uaci~eloi-:i of Science degree in co~npirter science, ;is is the present case.
, .
ll-ie regrrlations detir~e a third preference category professional as a "qualified alien who IrolJs at least a
United States baccalaikreate degree or- a forei~ equivalent deg~ee and who is a inerzrber of the prokssiirns."
8 C.F.K.
204.5{1)(2) and 8 C.F.R. 5 204.S(ij(3j(ii)(C).
r'rl:hough certain reguiations for terrlporary
worker S~~IS aljovi 2 combinstion of education and esperie~ce, the in~rnigrarlt visas {enlployment based third
pel-krence) regulatictns do nor.
'The above reg~ilatiotrs at 8 CT.I;'.K. 3 204,5(i)(3)(ii){G') use a skguiar description
fbrriglz equivaler~t degree.
'n1~13, fit. pr0fe~~r~)izals, the plzin n1e;iriitlg of the ieg~ilatory language sets for~h the rcquirenient that a baleiiciary
must groducr degree that i:: deter-!riined to k t!~e c"<>reigi equivaleni ofa U.S, haccala~rreate deg-ee in order to
bc quziified as a pl-ofessional fir ihird preference visa category piirposes.
i
. . . . . . . .. -
. . . . . . . . . . . . . -
"~ertain nonimmigrant visas do all[:tw a conibination of edrication and experierzce. .SLY 8 C.F.R. $ 214.2
'I'he petitioner {ltiied to subnnt evidencc s:ificient to demi?nsirate :]-tat ti-~e beneficiiiry has a United States
baccalaureate or an equivalent foreign degree required by the preference classifjcation fix cvhich the Alien
Ernp!oy~~lent Cexiitication accompal~ying the petition specified. The instmt petition, submitted pursuant to 8
C.F.R.$204,5(i). nlay noi be approved.
The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petiti~?~?~. SCCI~OLI 39 I of the ,Act, Q U.S.C.
jj 136;. 'The peiilioiser has not niet iiut bur6r.n.
ORDER: 'The zippeal is d~sn-ilssed. Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.