dismissed
EB-3
dismissed EB-3 Case: Tailoring
Decision Summary
The motions to reopen and reconsider were denied. The petitioner failed to respond to a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) concerning derogatory information and discrepancies about the beneficiary's qualifying experience. Due to the lack of a timely response, the motions were denied as abandoned.
Criteria Discussed
Ability To Pay Proffered Wage Beneficiary'S Qualifying Experience Failure To Respond To Noid
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services MATTER OF M-C- Non-Precedent Decision of the AdministratiH Appeals Office DATE: FEB. 26. 2018 MOTION ON ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS OFFICE DECISION PETITION: FORM 1-140. IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER The Petitioner, a provider of dry cleaning and tailoring services. seeks to employ the Beneficiary as an alteration tailor. It requests her classification as a skilled worker under the third-preference. immigrant category. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(h)(3)(A)(i). 8 U.S.C. ~ I I 53(h )(3 )(A)(i ). This employment-based, ยทยทEB-r category allows a U.S. business to sponsor a foreign national with at least two years of training or experience for lawful permanent resident status. The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition. concluding that the Petitioner did not demonstrate its required ability to pay the proffered wage. On appeal. we af1inned the Dircctorยทs decision. S'ee Maller ofM-C-. ][) #78179 (AAO Mar. 30. 20 17). We also found that the record did not establish the Beneficiary's possession of the minimum experience required for the offered position or the requested classi tication. !d. The matter is now before us on the Petitioner's motions to reopen and reconsider. The Petitioner submits additional evidence and asserts both its ability to pay the proffered wage and the Beneficiary's possession of the requisite experience. During the course of adjudication. we mailed a notice of intent to deny (NOID) to the Petitioner. with a copy to counsel. The NOID informed the Petitiom.:r of derogatory information and discrepancies of record regarding the Beneficiary's claimed. qualifying experience. The NOID. sent January II, 2018, warned the Petitioner that, absent a response within 33 days of the notice's mailing. we may deny the motions. ,)'ee 8 C.F.R. ~~ 103.2(b)(8)(iv). 103.8(b) (allowing up to 30 days to respond to a NOID and adding three days if the notice was served by regular mail). To date. more than 40 days after we mailed the NOID. we have not received a response. If a petitioner does not timely respond to a NOID. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) may summarily deny the petition. 8 C.F.R. ~ 103.2(h)(l3)(i). USCIS may also deny a petition if a petitioner withholds requested evidence. preventing a material line of inquiry. X C.F.R. ~ 103.2(b)(l4). The Petitioner did not timely respond to the NOID. Under 8 C.F.R. ~ I 03.2(b )(13 )(i ). we will therefore deny the motions as abandoned. ;\4alll:r of M-( '_ ORDER: The motion to reopen is denied. FURTHER ORDER: The motion to reconsider is denied. Cite as Matter o(i'vf-C-.lD# 667757 (AAO Feb. 26. 2018) 2
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.