dismissed EB-3 Case: Textile Design
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date. The petitioner's federal tax returns for the relevant years showed that its net income and net current assets were both significantly less than the proffered annual salary. The AAO rejected counsel's arguments to consider depreciation or net operating loss as available funds, affirming that CIS properly relies on net income or net current assets to determine financial ability.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft guides you through USCIS criteria so your draft is organized around the right evidence, legal framing, and common denial patterns.
Start a Stronger Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.