EB-3 Dismissed — Tree Maintenance (2006): did not establish evidence of the beneficiary's required

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to submit evidence of the beneficiary's required two years of work experience in response to the director's Request for Evidence (RFE). The AAO did not consider the experience letter submitted for the first time on appeal, and further noted that even if it did, the letter was questionable and insufficient to prove the beneficiary met the requirements.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF