dismissed EB-3

dismissed EB-3 Case: Unknown

📅 Date unknown 👤 Company 📂 Unknown

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed for procedural reasons, not on its merits. Before the AAO could render a decision, the petitioner requested to withdraw the appeal. Based on this withdrawal, the appeal was dismissed.

Criteria Discussed

Not specified

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
ideatifiing data deleted to 
prevent clei~; ~nwmanted 
in- of gjawad privacy 
PUBLIC COPY 
US. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rrn. 3000 
Washington, DC 20529 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
86 
FILE: - Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date: 
SRC-07-042-52745 
 RUG 0 8 MOi 
PETITION: Immigrant petition for Alien Worker as a Skilled Worker or Professional pursuant to section 
203(b)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 153(b)(3) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
DISCUSSION: The preference visa petition was denied by the Director, Texas Service Center, on February 
15, 2007, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. On June 7, 2007, before 
any decision, the petitioner, through counsel, requested that the appeal be withdrawn. The withdrawal may 
not be retracted. 8 C.F.R. fj 103.2(b)(6). 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed based on its withdrawal by the petitioner. 
Robert P. Wiemann, Chief 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.