dismissed
EB-3
dismissed EB-3 Case: Unknown
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed for procedural reasons, not on its merits. Before the AAO could render a decision, the petitioner requested to withdraw the appeal. Based on this withdrawal, the appeal was dismissed.
Criteria Discussed
Not specified
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
ideatifiing data deleted to prevent clei~; ~nwmanted in- of gjawad privacy PUBLIC COPY US. Department of Homeland Security 20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rrn. 3000 Washington, DC 20529 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 86 FILE: - Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date: SRC-07-042-52745 RUG 0 8 MOi PETITION: Immigrant petition for Alien Worker as a Skilled Worker or Professional pursuant to section 203(b)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 153(b)(3) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS: This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. DISCUSSION: The preference visa petition was denied by the Director, Texas Service Center, on February 15, 2007, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. On June 7, 2007, before any decision, the petitioner, through counsel, requested that the appeal be withdrawn. The withdrawal may not be retracted. 8 C.F.R. fj 103.2(b)(6). ORDER: The appeal is dismissed based on its withdrawal by the petitioner. Robert P. Wiemann, Chief Administrative Appeals Office
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.