dismissed EB-3

dismissed EB-3 Case: Unknown

📅 Date unknown 👤 Company 📂 Unknown

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner, through counsel, requested that the appeal be withdrawn. In accordance with regulations, the AAO accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the matter.

Criteria Discussed

Not specified

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
PUBLIC COPY 
U.S. Department of Ifomeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rrn. A3000 
Washington, DC 20529 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
4 6 
FILE: WAC 05 040 54854 Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: 2 9 2006 
PETITION: 
 Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Skilled Worker or Professional Pursuant to 
Section 203(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 11 53(b) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned 
to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
DISCUSSION: The immigrant visa petition was denied by the director, California Service Center. The 
matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. On April 7, 2006, the 
petitioner, through counsel, requested that the appeal be withdrawn. The withdrawal may not be 
retracted. 8 C.F.R. 5 103.2(b)(6). 
is dismissed based on its withdrawal by the petitioner. 
Robert P. Wiemann, Chief 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.