dismissed EB-3

dismissed EB-3 Case: Unknown

📅 Date unknown 👤 Company 📂 Unknown

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner, through counsel, requested that the appeal be withdrawn. Per 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(6), a withdrawal may not be retracted, so the AAO dismissed the case.

Criteria Discussed

Withdrawal Of Appeal

View Full Decision Text

u.a. uepannlent or nomelana Decurlry 
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rrn. 3000 
Washington, DC 20529 
U. S. Citizenship 
2nd Tmmioratinn 
FILE: Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: mT 0 6 2006 
PETITION: Immigrant petition for Alien Worker as a Skilled Worker or Professional pursuant to section 
203(b)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 11 53(b)(3) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
DISCUSSION: The visa petition was denied by the Director, Vermont Service Center, and is now before the 
' Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. 
 On October 2, 2006, the petitioner through counsel 
' 
requested that the appeal be withdrawn. The withdrawal may not be retracted. See 8 C.F.R. 8 103.2(b)(6). 
i 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed based on its withdrawal by the petitioner. 
Robert P. Wiemann, Chief 
Administrative Appeals Office

Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.