dismissed EB-3

dismissed EB-3 Case: Unknown

📅 Date unknown 👤 Company 📂 Unknown

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner formally requested to withdraw the appeal on April 28, 2006. The decision is based solely on this withdrawal, as such an action may not be retracted.

Criteria Discussed

Withdrawal Of Appeal

View Full Decision Text

ndenm data deleted to 
prevent dearly unwarranted 
 an of wfsonrrl ~rtvam 
PUBLIC COPY 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rrn. A3042 
Washington, DC 20529 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
IN RE: 
PETITION: 
 Immigrant petition for Alien Worker as a Skilled Worker or Professional pursuant to 
section 203(b)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 3 1153(b)(3) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) in your case. All documents have been 
returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that ofice. 
DISCUSSION: The Director, Texas Service Center, denied the immigrant visa petition. The matter is now 
before the AAO on appeal. On April 28, 2006, the petitioner requested that the appeal be withdrawn. The 
withdrawal may not be retracted. 8 C.F.R. 3 103.2(b)(6). 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed based upon its withdrawal by the petitioner. 
Robert P. Wiemann, Chief 
Administrative Appeals Office

Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.