remanded
EB-3
remanded EB-3 Case: Agriculture
Avoid this EB-3 denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO concluded that the Director's Request for Evidence (RFE) did not sufficiently notify the petitioner of the required proof and the need to explain evidentiary discrepancies. The AAO found that before denying the petition, the Director should have issued another, more specific RFE or a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) to give the petitioner a fair opportunity to address the inconsistencies.
Criteria Discussed
Beneficiary Qualifications Experience Verification Labor Certification Requirements Evidentiary Inconsistencies Sufficiency Of Rfe
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-3 petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.