Remanded
EB-3
EB-3 Remanded — Agriculture (2022): the AAO disagreed with the Director's finding that the
Decision Summary
The AAO disagreed with the Director's finding that the petitioner made a material misrepresentation on the labor certification and withdrew that decision. However, the record lacked the required financial evidence to demonstrate the petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage. The case was remanded for the Director to request the necessary financial documentation and re-adjudicate the petition.
Criteria Discussed
Labor Certification Validity Material Misrepresentation Ability To Pay Proffered Wage Prohibited Fees Paid By Beneficiary
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-3 decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →