EB-3 Remanded — Architecture (2024): did not establish ability to pay the proffered wage based

Decision Summary

The Director denied the petition for failing to establish the ability to pay the proffered wage based on net income and net current assets. The AAO remanded the case because the Director did not conduct a proper 'totality of the circumstances' analysis as required by precedent (Matter of Sonegawa) and failed to advise the petitioner on the types of evidence considered in such an analysis.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF