remanded
EB-3
remanded EB-3 Case: Auto Body Repair
Decision Summary
The director denied the petition for abandonment, claiming the petitioner failed to respond to a request for evidence. The AAO found that the petitioner did, in fact, respond in a timely manner to the director's duplicative requests and provided proof of submission. Consequently, the denial for abandonment was improper and the petition was remanded for a decision on its merits.
Criteria Discussed
Abandonment Timely Response To Request For Evidence
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-3 petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.