remanded EB-3 Case: Cabinet Manufacturing
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the initial denial was based on an incorrect premise. The director denied the petition because the petitioner was not paying the beneficiary the full proffered wage, but the AAO clarified that this is not required until the beneficiary obtains lawful permanent residence. However, the case was sent back for further consideration on the unresolved issue of whether the petitioner could demonstrate a continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-3 petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.