remanded
EB-3
remanded EB-3 Case: Commercial Cleaning
Avoid this EB-3 denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director did not properly assess the petitioner's claim that a successor-in-interest had acquired the company and that the job offer remained valid. The AAO determined that the Director failed to sufficiently analyze whether the new company qualified as a successor-in-interest and had the ability to pay the proffered wage, sending the case back for a new decision.
Criteria Discussed
Successor-In-Interest Ability To Pay Bona Fide Job Offer
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-3 petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.