remanded
EB-3
remanded EB-3 Case: Computer Hardware Engineering
Decision Summary
The AAO withdrew the Director's decision, finding no inconsistencies in the evidence of the beneficiary's past job duties. However, the case was remanded because the petitioner did not establish that the beneficiary's experience included the specific equipment and technologies required by the job offer, and also appeared to rely on experience the beneficiary gained with the petitioning company.
Criteria Discussed
Beneficiary'S Qualifying Experience Labor Certification Requirements Consistency Of Job Duties In Evidence Experience Gained With The Petitioner
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-3 petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.