remanded EB-3

remanded EB-3 Case: Construction

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Construction

Decision Summary

The appeal was remanded because the Director's denial failed to properly consider and address the new evidence submitted by the Petitioner regarding the Beneficiary's qualifying work experience. The AAO found it was not clear from the decision that the Director had properly considered the evidence submitted in response to the Notice of Intent to Deny and instructed the Service Center to issue a new decision, which should also address the petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage.

Criteria Discussed

Beneficiary Qualifications Ability To Pay Proffered Wage

Sign up free to download the original PDF

Draft your EB-3 petition with AAO precedents

MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.

Sign Up Free →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.