remanded EB-3 Case: Construction
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director's denial failed to properly consider and address the new evidence submitted by the Petitioner regarding the Beneficiary's qualifying work experience. The AAO found it was not clear from the decision that the Director had properly considered the evidence submitted in response to the Notice of Intent to Deny and instructed the Service Center to issue a new decision, which should also address the petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-3 petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.