Remanded
EB-3
EB-3 Remanded โ Culinary Arts (2022): the AAO found that the Director erred in determining the
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO found that the Director erred in determining the position did not qualify as a skilled worker. However, the AAO identified new deficiencies in the record, specifically regarding the beneficiary's proof of qualifying experience and the petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage. The case was sent back to the Director to request further evidence on these issues and issue a new decision.
Criteria Discussed
Skilled Worker Classification Beneficiary Qualifications Ability To Pay
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-3 decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ