EB-3 Remanded — Culinary Arts (2006): the evidence submitted to prove the beneficiary's required

Decision Summary

The appeal was remanded because the evidence submitted to prove the beneficiary's required two years of experience was inconsistent and problematic. Letters from the former employer contained conflicting dates and lacked detail, and the fact that the petitioner's owner was also the beneficiary's former employer raised questions. The case requires further proceedings to address these evidentiary issues, including the credibility of affidavits and the beneficiary's qualifications at the time of claimed employment.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF