Remanded
EB-3
EB-3 Remanded — Engineering (2023): the AAO found that the petitioner had not yet demonstrated
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO found that the petitioner had not yet demonstrated the beneficiary's qualifying experience for the offered position. Additionally, the petitioner did not establish its ability to pay the proffered wage. The AAO disagreed with the Director's initial denial reasons related to job availability and willful misrepresentation.
Criteria Discussed
Beneficiary'S Qualifying Experience Ability To Pay Proffered Wage Willful Misrepresentation Labor Certification Requirements
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-3 decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →