EB-3 Remanded — Food Service (2022): the AAO found the petitioner did establish its intent for

Decision Summary

The appeal was remanded because the AAO found the petitioner did establish its intent for full-time employment, overturning the Director's reason for denial. However, the case was sent back for a new decision because the petitioner had not demonstrated its continuing ability to pay the proffered wage beyond the petition's priority year, especially considering the large number of other petitions it had filed.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF