remanded EB-3 Case: Healthcare
Decision Summary
The director denied the petition, questioning whether the petitioner was the true employer and if a full-time position was genuinely available, citing a lack of employment records for previously approved beneficiaries. The petitioner responded that it had outsourced its payroll and HR functions to a third-party company, which explained the discrepancy. The case was remanded for the director to consider the new evidence regarding the petitioner's business structure and the validity of the job offer.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-3 petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.