remanded EB-3

remanded EB-3 Case: Information Technology

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Information Technology

Decision Summary

The Director's denial did not sufficiently analyze the petitioner's expert opinions regarding the beneficiary's foreign degree. The AAO remanded the case to allow the petitioner to respond to adverse information from the EDGE database, which suggests the three-year Indian degree is not equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree.

Criteria Discussed

Possession Of Required Education Foreign Degree Equivalency

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re: 23661037 
Appeal of Texas Service Center Decision 
Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Professional 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Date : JAN. 12, 2023 
The Petitioner, an information technology company, seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a software 
applications developer. It requests classification of the Beneficiary under the third-preference , 
immigrant classification for professional workers . Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 
203(b)(3)(A)(ii), 8 U.S.C. ยง l 153(b)(3)(A)(ii). This employment-based category allows a U.S. 
employer to sponsor a professional with a baccalaureate degree for lawful permanent resident status. 
The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner did not 
establish the Beneficiary's possession of the minimum education required for the offered position and 
the requested visa classification. The matter is now before us on appeal. 8 C.F.R . ยง 103.3. 
On appeal , the Petitioner points to submitted expert opinions and contends these demonstrate that the 
Beneficiary's three-year Indian bachelor's degree is the equivalent of a U.S . bachelor's degree; and 
therefore, that he qualifies for the proffered position. 
The Petitioner bears the burden of proof to demonstrate eligibility by a preponderance of the evidence . 
Matter of Chawathe, 25 l&N Dec. 369, 375-76 (AAO 2010). We review the questions in this matter 
de novo. Matter of Christo 's, Inc., 26 l&N Dec. 537, 537 n.2 (AAO 2015). Upon de novo review, 
we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand this matter for the entry of a new decision 
consistent with the following analysis. 
I. EMPLOYMENT-BASED IMMIGRATION 
Immigration as a professional generally follows a three-step process. To permanently fill a position 
in the United States with a foreign worker, a prospective employer must first obtain U.S . Department 
of Labor (DOL) certification. See section 212(a)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1182(a)(5)(A)(i). DOL 
approval signifies that insufficient U.S. workers are able, willing, qualified, and available for an offered 
position. Id. Labor certification also indicates that employment of a noncitizen will not harm wages and 
working conditions of U.S. workers with similar jobs. Id. 
If DOL approves a position, an employer must next submit the certified labor application with an 
immigrant visa petition to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). See section 204 of 
the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1154. Among other things, USCIS determines whether a beneficiary meets the 
requirements of a DOL-certified position and a requested visa classification. If USCIS grants a 
petition, a noncitizen may finally apply for an immigrant visa abroad or, if eligible, adjustment of 
status in the United States. See section 245 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1255. 
II. BENEFICIARY'S POSSESSION OF THE REQUIRED EDUCATION 
A professional must hold at least a U.S. bachelor's degree or a foreign equivalent degree. 8 C.F.R. 
ยง 204.5(1)(2) (defining the term "professional"). A petitioner must also demonstrate a beneficiary's 
possession of all DOL-certified job requirements of an offered position by a petition's priority date. 
Matter of Wing's Tea House, 16 I&N Dec. 158, 160 (Acting Reg'l Comm'r 1977). In evaluating a 
beneficiary's qualifications, USCIS must examine the job-offer portion of an accompanying labor 
certification to determine a position's minimum job requirements. USCIS may neither ignore a 
certification term, nor impose additional requirements. See, e.g., Madany v. Smith, 696 F.2d 1008, 
1015 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (holding that "DOL bears the authority for setting the content of the labor 
certification") ( emphasis in original). A baccalaureate degree in the United States generally requires 
four years of academic study. See Matter of Shah, 17 I&N Dec. 244, 245 (Reg'l Comm'r 1977). 
The labor certification states that the minimum educational requirement of the offered position of 
software applications developer is a U.S. bachelor's or a foreign equivalent degree in electronics or 
computer science. On the labor certification, the Beneficiary attested that, by the petition's priority 
date, he had attained a bachelor of science degree in electronics from a university based in India. As 
proof of the Beneficiary's educational qualifications, the Petitioner submitted copies of his bachelor 
of science diploma and his examination results. The Petitioner also submitted three independent, 
professional evaluations of the Beneficiary's foreign educational credentials. One evaluation 
indicated that the Beneficiary's foreign bachelor's degree was the equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's 
degree in mathematics, electronics, and computer science. The other two evaluations opined that the 
Beneficiary's three-year Indian bachelor of science degree was the equivalent of a four-year bachelor 
of science degree from a U.S. institution, further emphasizing that his studies abroad equated to 138 
semester hours in the United States. 
In denying the petition, the Director stated only that "the evidence does not establish that the 
beneficiary has a single United States baccalaureate degree or a foreign equivalent degree that requires 
four (4) years of education." The Director further indicated that the Beneficiary had only earned a 
three-year foreign baccalaureate degree. However, the Director's conclusion did not sufficiently 
analyze the Petitioner's assertion that the Beneficiary's three-year Indian bachelor of science degree 
was equivalent to a U.S. bachelor of science degree. The Director did not properly address the expert 
opinions provided to support this contention. In any future decision, the Director should sufficiently 
discuss these assertions and the submitted evidence. 
In addition, federal courts have supported our utilization of the Educational Database for Global 
Education (EDGE) 1, created by the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions 
1 EDGE is described on its information page as "a valuable resource for evaluating educational credentials earned in foreign 
systems, whether the purpose is ultimately for admission into an institution of higher learning in the United States, to 
obtain employment, to establish visa eligibility, or to qualify for additional professional qualifications." 
https://www.aacrao.org/resources/AACRAO-International/about-edge (last visited Jan. 12, 2023). 
2 
Officers (AACRAO) 2, as a resource for determining the U.S. equivalency of foreign degrees. See 
Viraj, LLC v. US. Att'y Gen., 578 Fed. Appx. 907, 910 (11th Cir. 2014) (the AAO is entitled to give 
letters from professors and academic credentials evaluations less weight when they differ from the 
information provided in EDGE). 
According to EDGE, a three-year bachelor of science degree in electronics from India comprises three 
years of tertiary study beyond the "higher secondary certificate" ( comparable to a high school diploma 
in the United States) and is comparable to three years of university study in the United States, not a 
full bachelor's degree. See American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers, 
Educational Database for Global Education, India Credentials, 3-year Bachelor of Science, 
https://www.aacrao.org/edge/country/credentials/credential/india/3-year-bachelor-of-arts-(b.a.)ยญ
bachelor-of-commerce-(b. com. )-bachelor-of-science-(b. sc. )-bachelor-of-computer-applications-
(b. c.a.) (last visited Jan. 12, 2023). EDGE also states that the entry requirement for any three-year 
bachelor's degree program in India is a higher secondary certificate - in other words, a high school 
level education in the United States. Id. This information indicates that the Beneficiary has not 
attained the foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree. However, the Petitioner was not aware of 
this information from EDGE related to the Beneficiary's foreign educational qualifications. 
Therefore, on remand, the Director should provide the Petitioner with the discussed EDGE report 
specific to a three-year Indian bachelor of science degree and afford it the opportunity to respond. 
ORDER: The decision of the Director is withdrawn. The matter is remanded for further 
proceedings consistent with the foregoing opinion and for the entry of a new decision. 
2 AACRAO is described on its website as "a nonprofit, voluntary, professional association of more than 1 LOOO higher 
education admissions and registration professionals who represent more than 2,600 institutions in over 40 countries." 
http://www.aacrao.org/who-we-are (last visited Jan. 12, 2023). 
3 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Draft your EB-3 petition with AAO precedents

MeritDraft uses real AAO decisions to generate compliant petition arguments tailored to your evidence.

Sign Up Free →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.