Remanded
EB-3
EB-3 Remanded โ Information Technology (2022): the Director erred in the initial denial
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director erred in the initial denial. The Director used the wrong proffered wage figure ($120,500 instead of $105,000 for the relevant period) and miscalculated the wages actually paid to the beneficiary by using net income instead of gross pay from the W-2 forms. The AAO instructed the Director to re-evaluate the petitioner's ability to pay for the one remaining year with a wage shortfall, considering the totality of the circumstances.
Criteria Discussed
Ability To Pay The Proffered Wage
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-3 decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ