remanded EB-3 Case: Landscaping
Avoid this EB-3 denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The case was remanded for further consideration because the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) identified new issues not addressed by the Director. While new evidence submitted on appeal suggested the beneficiary might meet the minimum three months of experience, the AAO found insufficient evidence to establish that the petitioning company was a valid successor-in-interest due to name changes and corporate conversions. The Director must resolve these discrepancies on remand.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-3 petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.