EB-3 Remanded — Market Research (2022): the Director's revocation was procedurally flawed

Decision Summary

The appeal was remanded because the Director's revocation was procedurally flawed. The AAO found that the Director failed to sufficiently explain the specific reasons for the revocation, did not provide adequate notice for the petitioner to rebut the grounds of misrepresentation, and failed to address key evidence submitted by the petitioner, such as the language barrier during a site visit and the beneficiary's alternative qualifying experience.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF