EB-3 Remanded — Marketing (2020): the AAO determined that the Director erred in finding the

Decision Summary

The appeal was remanded because the AAO determined that the Director erred in finding the petitioner lacked the ability to pay the proffered wage. However, the AAO found new deficiencies related to the beneficiary's qualifications, specifically that the evidence submitted did not sufficiently prove the required 60 months of qualifying work experience. The case was sent back for further consideration of the beneficiary's qualifications.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF