Remanded
EB-3
EB-3 Remanded — Network Administration (2018): the Director did not determine if the Beneficiary was an
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director did not determine if the Beneficiary was an 'affected party' with standing to appeal the petition's revocation. The AAO instructed the Director to first determine if the Beneficiary was eligible for and had properly ported the petition to a new job under section 204(j) of the Act, which would grant them standing in the revocation proceedings.
Criteria Discussed
Beneficiary Standing To Appeal Portability Under Section 204(J) Affected Party Status Educational Requirements
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-3 decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →