remanded EB-3 Case: Nursing
Decision Summary
The Director denied the petition because the application stated the job required no education, failing the 'skilled worker' standard of needing at least two years of training or experience. The AAO found that the application's requirement for a California registered nursing license, which necessitates at least two years of post-secondary education, created a contradiction. The case was remanded because the Director should have issued a Request for Evidence (RFE) to clarify this discrepancy before making a final decision.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration
Services
In Re: 25463031
Appeal of Nebraska Service Center Decision
Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Skilled Worker
Non-Precedent Decision of the
Administrative Appeals Office
Date : FEB. 15, 2023
The Petitioner provides rehabilitation services and seeks to permanently employ the Beneficiary as a
registered nurse . The company requests her classification under the third-preference, immigrant visa
category for "skilled workers ." See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b )(3)(A)(i),
8 U.S.C. 1153(b )(3)(A)(i). This category allows prospective, U.S. employers to sponsor noncitizens
for lawful permanent residence to perform work requiring at least two years of training or experience.
Id.
The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition . The Director concluded that the
offered position's requirements do not establish its need for at least two years of training or experience.
On appeal, the Petitioner contends that the Director overlooked the job's requirement for a California
registered nursing license. The company asserts that the license, in turn, requires at least two years of
post-secondary education, which - for immigration purposes - counts as training.
The Petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating eligibility for the requested benefit by a
preponderance of evidence . Matter of Chawathe, 25 I&N Dec . 369, 375-76 (AAO 2010) . Exercising
de novo appellate review, see Matter of Christa 's, Inc., 26 I&N Dec. 537, 537 n.2 (AAO 2015), we
will withdraw the petition's denial and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with
the following analysis.
I. LAW
Immigration as a skilled worker usually follows a three-step process. First, to permanently fill a
position with a foreign worker, a prospective, U.S. employer must obtain certification from the U.S.
Department of Labor (DOL). See section 212(a)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(5)(A)(i) . If
DOL approves a position, an employer must next submit the certified labor application with an
immigrant visa petition to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). Section 204(a)(l)(F)
of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § l 154(a)(l)(F) . Finally, ifUSCIS grants a petition, a noncitizen beneficiary may
apply abroad for an immigrant visa or, if eligible, "adjustment of status" in the United States. See
section 245 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255.
DOL, however, has already determined that the United States lacks sufficient nurses and that
employment of noncitizens in these "Schedule A" positions will not harm the wages or working
conditions of U.S. workers in similar jobs. 20 C.F.R. § 656.5. Thus, DOL authorizes USCIS, in
immigrant visa petition proceedings, to adjudicate Schedule A labor certification applications.
20 C.F.R. § 656.15(a). Therefore, USCIS rules not only on this petition, but also on its accompanying
labor certification application. See 20 C.F.R. § 656.15(e) (describing USCIS's Schedule A labor
certification determinations as "conclusive and final").
II. ANALYSIS
An application for Schedule A designation of a skilled worker position must demonstrate that the job
requires at least two years of training or experience. 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(1)(2), (4). "Relevant post
secondary education may be considered as training for the purposes of this provision." 8 C.F.R.
§ 204.5(1)(2) ( defining the term "skilled worker").
The Petitioner's Schedule A application (and its request for a prevailing wage determination) specifies
that the offered position of registered nurse requires neither education, training, nor experience. Part
H.14 of the application, "Specific skills or other requirements," states the job's need for "Current RN
licensure from the State of Practice." As the Petitioner offers the position in California, part H.14
indicates the job's need for a California registered nursing license.
The Petitioner's Schedule A application does not specify the underlying requirements for a California
registered nursing license. On appeal, however, the company submits evidence that the license
generally requires at least an associate of science degree in nursing. 1 See Cal. Bd. of Registered
Nursing, "Steps to Become a California Registered Nurse," https://www.rn.ca.gov/careers/
steps.shtml. Associate nursing degrees require at least two years of post-secondary studies. Id. And,
under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(1)(2), USCIS would consider this relevant, post-secondary education as
training. Thus, the Petitioner contends that, consistent with the requested immigrant visa category,
the Schedule A application demonstrates the position's requirement of at least two years of training.
Interpreting the Schedule A application as a whole, its job requirements appear to contradict each
other. See Matter of Symbioun Techs., Inc., 2010-PER-01422, *5 (BALCA Oct. 24, 2011) (making
"a comprehensive reading" of the job-offer portion of a labor certification application to determine a
position's minimum requirements). Asked to indicate the job's minimum level ofrequired education
in part H.4 of the application, the Petitioner marked "None." Yet, as the company's evidence shows,
the license requirement in part H.14 implicitly requires education. Faced with this apparent
contradiction, the Director should have issued a RFE or NOID, providing the Petitioner a chance to
explain the position's requirements. See l USCIS Policy Manual E(6)(F)(3), https://www.uscis.gov/
policy-manual ("If ... the evidence in the record does not establish eligibility for the benefit sought,
the officer should issue an RFE or NOID").
1 If a petitioner received notice of an evidentiary deficiency and a prior chance to submit the proof, we generally do not
accept the evidence on appeal. See Matter of Izaguirre, 27 l&N Dec. 67, 71 (BIA 2017) (citation omitted). Before denying
this petition, however, the Director did not request additional evidence (RFE) or issue a notice of intent to deny (NOID).
See 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(8)(iii). We will therefore consider the appellate evidence.
2
Because the Director has not seen the Petitioner's appellate evidence, we will withdraw the petition's
denial and remand the matter. On remand, the Director should consider the evidence and determine
whether it establishes the offered position's need for a skilled worker. The Director should also:
review the entire record; consider the petition's compliance with all other applicable laws, regulations,
and policies; and enter a new decision.
ORDER: The Director's decision is withdrawn. The matter is remanded for entry of a new
decision consistent with the foregoing analysis.
3 Draft your EB-3 petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft uses real AAO decisions to generate compliant petition arguments tailored to your evidence.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.