EB-3 Remanded — Poultry Processing (2022): the AAO disagreed with the Director's findings that the job

Decision Summary

The AAO disagreed with the Director's findings that the job was not a bona fide opportunity and that the stated requirements were not the actual minimums. However, the case was remanded because the petitioner had not submitted the required financial evidence to demonstrate its continuing ability to pay the proffered wage since the priority date. The case was sent back to the Director for further consideration on the ability-to-pay issue, as the necessary evidence was not available at the time of the initial decision.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF