remanded EB-3 Case: Retail
Avoid this EB-3 denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director erred by not issuing a Request for Evidence (RFE) or a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID), which is contrary to USCIS policy and prevented the petitioner from submitting additional evidence. Furthermore, the Director failed to consider the totality of the circumstances regarding the petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage, particularly its financial performance in years preceding the priority date, as allowed under Matter of Sonegawa.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-3 petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.