EB-3 Remanded — Software Development: although the petitioner submitted new evidence of work

Decision Summary

The case was remanded because although the petitioner submitted new evidence of work experience on appeal, the AAO identified new deficiencies. The experience letters failed to specify if the employment was full-time, and the petitioner did not submit the required Form ETA 750B for the substituted beneficiary. The case was returned to the director to request this missing evidence and re-evaluate the beneficiary's eligibility.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF