remanded EB-3 Case: Software Development
Decision Summary
The case was remanded because although the petitioner submitted new evidence of work experience on appeal, the AAO identified new deficiencies. The experience letters failed to specify if the employment was full-time, and the petitioner did not submit the required Form ETA 750B for the substituted beneficiary. The case was returned to the director to request this missing evidence and re-evaluate the beneficiary's eligibility.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-3 petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.