Remanded
EB-3
EB-3 Remanded — Tailoring (2022): the Director failed to address the petitioner's response to
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director failed to address the petitioner's response to the Notice of Intent to Revoke concerning the bona fide job offer. Additionally, the AAO found unresolved inconsistencies regarding the beneficiary's claimed work experience and discrepancies in the petitioner's financial documents, requiring further review of the beneficiary's qualifications and the company's ability to pay the proffered wage.
Criteria Discussed
Bona Fide Job Offer Beneficiary'S Qualifications Ability To Pay Proffered Wage Material Misrepresentation
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-3 decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →