Remanded EB-3

EB-3 Remanded โ€” Tennis (2006): the record was incomplete and confusing

๐Ÿ“… 2006-02-01 ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Tennis

Decision Summary

The appeal was remanded because the record was incomplete and confusing. The AAO could not determine the petitioner's identity or its relationship to another business entity mentioned in the record, which prevented a proper analysis of its ability to pay the proffered wage. The case was sent back to the director to obtain and submit a complete record before a final decision could be made.

Criteria Discussed

Ability To Pay Proffered Wage Successor-In-Interest
๐Ÿ“„ Original decision (USCIS PDF)

Sign up free to download the original PDF

Research more EB-3 decisions on MeritDraft

Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.

Browse Decisions โ†’