Remanded
EB-3
EB-3 Remanded โ Tennis (2006): the record was incomplete and confusing
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the record was incomplete and confusing. The AAO could not determine the petitioner's identity or its relationship to another business entity mentioned in the record, which prevented a proper analysis of its ability to pay the proffered wage. The case was sent back to the director to obtain and submit a complete record before a final decision could be made.
Criteria Discussed
Ability To Pay Proffered Wage Successor-In-Interest
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-3 decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ