sustained EB-3 Case: Construction
Decision Summary
The director initially denied the petition, concluding that the petitioner had not demonstrated the ability to pay the proffered wage. The appeal was sustained because the AAO's de novo review of the evidence, including federal tax returns and financial statements submitted on appeal, established that the petitioner's net income and/or net current assets were sufficient to cover the beneficiary's salary from the priority date onward.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.