Sustained
EB-3
EB-3 Sustained — Education (2017): the petitioner successfully refuted the Director's grounds
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner successfully refuted the Director's grounds for revocation, which were based on fraud or willful misrepresentation. The petitioner provided evidence that the beneficiary's foreign university was accredited, submitted new credential evaluations confirming the degree's U.S. equivalency, and the AAO found the Director did not provide a rationale for finding the job offer was not bona fide.
Criteria Discussed
Beneficiary'S Educational Credentials Validity Of Foreign Degree Evaluation Accreditation Of Foreign Institution Bona Fide Job Offer
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-3 decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →