sustained EB-3

sustained EB-3 Case: Education

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Education

Decision Summary

The appeal was sustained because the petitioner provided sufficient evidence on appeal to overcome the director's grounds for revocation. Specifically, new documentation established that the beneficiary possessed the required two years of work experience and that the petitioner had the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date onward.

Criteria Discussed

Beneficiary'S Requisite Experience Ability To Pay Proffered Wage

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF I-, INC. 
APPEAL OF TEXAS SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: JULY 2, 2019 
PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER 
The Petitioner, a preschool arts and music academy, seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a file clerk. It 
requests classification of the Beneficiary as a skilled worker under the third preference immigrant 
category. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b )(3)(A)(i), 8 U.S.C. 
ยง 1153(b)(3)(A)(i). This employment-based "EB-3" immigrant classification allows a U.S. 
employer to sponsor a foreign national for lawful permanent resident status to work in a position that 
requires at least two years of training or experience. 
The Director of the Texas Service Center initially approved the petition in January 2016. The 
Director subsequently revoked the approval on the grounds that (1) the Petitioner did not establish 
that the Beneficiary had the requisite experience to qualify for skilled worker classification and to 
meet the terms of the labor certification, and (2) the Petitioner did not establish its continuing ability 
to pay the proffered wage from the priority date onward. 
On appeal the Petitioner submits additional documentation and asserts that the evidence of record 
overcomes the Director's grounds for revocation . 
Upon de nova review, we will sustain the appeal. 
To qualify for classification as a skilled worker a beneficiary must have at least two years of training 
or experience. 8 C.F.R. ยง 204.5(1)(3)(ii)(B). A beneficiary must also meet the specific educational, 
training, experience, and other requirements of the labor certification. Id. All requirements must be 
met by the petition's priority date, 1 which in this case is May 29, 2014. See Matter of Wing's Tea 
House, 16 I&N Dec. 158, 159 (Acting Reg'l Comm'r 1977). The labor certification in this case 
requires 24 months of experience in the job offered and states that the Beneficiary met this 
requirement by virtue of her employment as a file clerk with a preschool inl l for a 
three and a half year period from January 2008 through June 2011. Based on the entire record, 
including the materials submitted in support of the appeal, we find that the Petitioner has established, 
by a preponderance of the evidence, that the Beneficiary gained the requisite experience to qualify 
1 The "priority date" of a petition is the date the underlying labor certification was filed with the Department of Labor. 
See 8 C.F.R. ยง 204.5( d). 
Matter of 1-, Inc. 
for skilled worker classification and meet the terms of the labor certification. Accordingly, the 
Petitioner has overcome this ground for revocation. 
A petitioner must also establish its ability to pay the proffered wage stated in the labor certification 
from the priority date onward. As provided in the regulation at 8 C.F.R. ยง 204.5(g)(2), evidence of 
this ability to pay shall be in the form of copies of annual reports, or federal tax returns, or audited 
financial statements. In the revocation decision the Director found that the Petitioner established its 
ability to pay the proffered wage in 2016, the year the petition was originally approved. Based on 
audited financial statements for 2014 and 2015 submitted on appeal, we find that the Petitioner has 
also established its ability to pay the proffered wage in those two years. Therefore, the Petitioner has 
established its continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date of the petition 
through the date the petition was originally approved. Accordingly, the Petitioner has overcome this 
ground for revocation as well. 
ORDER: The appeal is sustained. 
Cite as Matter of I-, Inc., ID# 3452499 (AAO July 2, 2019) 
2 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Use this winning precedent in your petition

MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.

Build Your Winning Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.