sustained
EB-3
sustained EB-3 Case: Floor Covering
Decision Summary
The director denied the petition, concluding the beneficiary was not qualified for the proffered position. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding that the director misread the labor certification, which clearly allowed for an alternative experience requirement of four years as a 'floor covering installer.' The petitioner provided sufficient documentation to demonstrate that the beneficiary possessed this required experience, thus qualifying for the position.
Criteria Discussed
Beneficiary'S Qualifications Meet Labor Certification Requirements Alternative Experience Requirements Documentation Of Prior Work Experience
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.