sustained
EB-3
sustained EB-3 Case: Healthcare
Decision Summary
The initial denial was based on the petitioner's perceived inability to pay the proffered wage for all its sponsored workers. The appeal was sustained because the Service had misread the petitioner's financial statements, failing to account for the fact that the figures were reported 'in thousands.' Upon review, the AAO determined the petitioner did demonstrate the continuing ability to pay.
Criteria Discussed
Ability To Pay
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.