sustained
EB-3
sustained EB-3 Case: Healthcare
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner successfully demonstrated that the beneficiary possessed the requisite three months of experience as required by the labor certification. The director had denied the petition based on inconsistencies in the evidence, but on appeal, the AAO found that the preponderance of evidence supported the beneficiary's work history, despite a single contradictory handwritten note.
Criteria Discussed
Beneficiary'S Qualifications Requisite Experience Labor Certification Requirements Evidence Of Prior Employment Inconsistencies In The Record
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.