sustained EB-3 Case: Healthcare
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the Director incorrectly applied a regulation (20 C.F.R. § 656.17) that prohibits counting experience gained with the petitioning employer. The AAO found this regulation was misplaced, as the professional nurse position falls under Schedule A, which is governed by a different rule (20 C.F.R. § 656.15). The record showed the Beneficiary met the actual requirements, possessing the necessary license, degree, and experience for the position.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship Non-Precedent Decision of the and Immigration Administrative Appeals Office Services In Re : 26274825 Date : MAY 10, 2023 Appeal of Texas Service Center Decision Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Workers (Skilled Worker) The Petitioner, a healthcare service provider , seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a registered nurse under Schedule A. It requests classification of the Beneficiary as a skilled worker under the third preference immigrant classification. See Immigration and Nationality Act section 203(b)(3)(A)(i), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b )(3)(A)(i). This employment-based immigrant classification allows a U.S. employer to sponsor a noncitizen for lawful permanent resident status to work in a position that requires at least two years of training or experience. The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish that the Beneficiary is qualified for the position. Specifically, the Director found that Department of Labor (DOL) guidance precludes consideration of experience gained under a petitioning employer if the experience is in a position substantially comparable to the position sought. See 20 C.F.R. § 656 .17. The matter is now before us on appeal. 8 C.F.R. § 103.3. The Petitioner bears the burden of proof to demonstrate eligibility by a preponderance of the evidence. Matter ofChawathe, 25 I&N Dec. 369 , 375-76 (AAO 2010). We review the questions in this matter de novo. Matter of Christo 's, Inc., 26 l&N Dec. 537, 537 n.2 (AAO 2015). Upon de novo review, we will sustain the appeal. The DOL has determined that there are not sufficient U.S. workers who are able , willing, qualified , and available for certain occupations designated under Schedule A, which in relevant part includes workers who will be employed as professional nurses who hold a permanent, full, and unrestricted license to practice professional nursing in the state of intended employment. See 20 C.F.R. § 656.5(a)(2)(ii) . An employer seeking labor certification for a Schedule A occupation must apply under 20 C.F.R. §§ 656 .10 and 656 .15. 20 C.F.R. § 656 .IO(a)(3) . Petitions for Schedule A occupations do not require a petitioner to test the labor market and obtain a certified labor certification from the DOL prior to filing the petition with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) . Instead , the petition is filed directly with USCIS with an uncertified labor certification . See 8 C.F .R. § 204.5(a)(2); see also 20 C.F.R. § 656.15. 1 Specifically , "[a]pplication for certification of employment as a professional 1 The priority date of the petition is August 15, 2022, the date the completed , signed petition was properly filed with USCIS. See 8 C.F.R. § 204.S(d). nurse may be made only under§ 656.15(c) and not under§ 656.17." 20 C.F.R. § 656.15(c)(2). 2 Therefore, the Director's application of the regulation at 20 C.F.R. § 656.17 is misplaced in this case. The record establishes that the State of Georgia Board of Nursing issued the Beneficiary a "Regisstered Prof Nurse" license in 2018 and it remains active. The record further establishes that University awarded the Beneficiary a bachelor of science in nursing degree, which satisfies the requirement provided on the labor certification that the Beneficiary has at least an associate's degree in nursing. Additionally, the Beneficiary's nursing experience working for the Petitioner satisfies the labor certification requirement of at least one year of nursing experience within the prior five years, and the record contains a BLS certification for the Beneficiary, as required by the labor certification. The record, considered in its entirety under the preponderance of evidence standard, establishes that the Beneficiary is qualified for the position sought. We withdraw the Director's conclusion to the contrary. ORDER: The appeal is sustained. 2 Labor certifications for professional nurses "shall not be considered" under 20 C.F .R. § 656.17. 20 C.F .R. § 656.1 S(f). 2
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.