sustained
EB-3
sustained EB-3 Case: Healthcare
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the Service Center made a fundamental error in reading the petitioner's financial statements. The Service failed to recognize that the financial figures were reported 'in thousands,' leading to an incorrect conclusion about the petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage. Upon de novo review, the AAO found the financial statements did demonstrate the required ability to pay.
Criteria Discussed
Ability To Pay Proffered Wage
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services MATTER OF C-F-V-H-S- APPEAL OF TEXAS SERVICE CENTER DECISION Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: MAY 25,2018 PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER The Petitioner, a healthcare system, seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a registered nurse. 1 It . requests classification of the Beneficiary as a skilled worker under the third preference immigrant classification. Immigration and Nationality· Act (the Act) section 203(b)(3)(A)(i), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(3)(A)(i). This employment-based immigrant classification allows a U.S. employer to sponsor a foreign national for lawful permanent resident status to work in a position that requires at least two years of training or experience. The Acting Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish, as required, that the Petitioner had the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage, because its audited financial statements did not show sufficient net income or net current assets to pay the combined proffered wages of all of the beneficiaries of its applicable Fonns 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker 2 On appeal, the Petitioner submits additional evidence and asserts that "the Service made a fundamental mistake when it read the Petitioner's financial statements. The Service failed to account for the fact that the Petitioner's financial statements are 'in thousands'." Upon de novo review, we will sustain the appeaL The audited financial statements demonstrate the Petitioner's continuing ability to pay the combined wages of all of its applicable Form 1-140 beneficiaries pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2). The record otherwise establishes the eligibility of the Petitioner and the Beneficiary for the requested benefit. 1 A Schedule A occupation is an occupation codified at 20 C.F.R. § 656.5(a) for which the U.S. Depanment of Labor has detennined that there are not sufficient U.S. workers who are able, willing, qualified and available and that the wages and working conditions of similarly employed U.S. work~rs will not be adversely affected by the employment of foreign nationals in such occupations. The current list of Schedule A occupations includes professional nurses. /d. 2 Where a petitioner has filed Fonn 1-140 petitions for multiple beneficiaries, it must demonstrate that its job otTer to each beneficiary is realistic, and that it has the ability to pay the proffered wage to each beneficiary. See 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2); see also Patel v. Johnson, 2 F. Supp. 3d· I OS, 124 (D. Mass. 2014). · Matter ofC-F- V-H-S- ORDER: The appeal is sustained. Cite as Matter ofC-F-V-H-S-, ID# 1345875 (AAO May 25, 2018) 2
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.