sustained
EB-3
sustained EB-3 Case: Healthcare
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the Service Center made a fundamental error in reading the petitioner's financial statements. The Service failed to recognize that the financial figures were reported 'in thousands,' leading to an incorrect conclusion about the petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage. Upon de novo review, the AAO found the financial statements did demonstrate the required ability to pay.
Criteria Discussed
Ability To Pay Proffered Wage
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.