EB-3 Sustained — Healthcare (2018): the Service Center made a fundamental error in reading the

Decision Summary

The appeal was sustained because the Service Center made a fundamental error in reading the petitioner's financial statements. The Service failed to recognize that the financial figures were reported 'in thousands,' leading to an incorrect conclusion about the petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage. Upon de novo review, the AAO found the financial statements did demonstrate the required ability to pay.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF