sustained
EB-3
sustained EB-3 Case: Landscaping
Decision Summary
The director denied the petition due to contradictions regarding the beneficiary's weekly hours worked in a prior position (40 hours claimed vs. 20 hours on the ETA 750) and a lack of payroll evidence. The appeal was sustained because the petitioner provided new letters and an affidavit successfully explaining that the 20-hour entry was a scrivener's error and that the beneficiary did in fact work the required full-time hours to qualify.
Criteria Discussed
Experience Requirement From Labor Certification Documentation Of Prior Experience Typographical Error On Eta 750 Discrepancy In Hours Worked
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.