sustained EB-3 Case: Nursing
Decision Summary
The Director denied the petition, finding the prevailing wage determination (PWD) was invalid as it did not match the job requirements on the Form ETA 9089, and also concluded the beneficiary did not meet the requirements for a Schedule A professional nurse. The AAO found that the PWD was valid for the offered position and that the beneficiary did satisfy the regulatory requirements, thus overcoming the Director's reasons for denial.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
MATTER OF M-R-M-C-P-D-, INC. APPEAL OF TEXAS SERVICE CENTER DECISION . Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals OfficeΒ· DATE: MAY 15,2018 PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER The Petitioner, a hospital, seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a registered nurse, a Schedule A occupation as codified at 20 C.F.R. Β§ 656.5(a). It requests her classification as a skilled worker under the third-preference, immigrant category. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(3)(A)(i), 8 U.S.C. Β§ 1153(b)(3)(A)(i). This employment-based category allows a U.S. business to sponsor a foreign national with at least two years of training or experience for lawful permanent resident status. The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition after concluding that it was not supported by a valid prevailing wage determination (PWD) from the U.S. Department of Labor, as required for Schedule A petitions. Specifically, the Director found that the PWD was not valid because it did not reflect the exact same job requirements described on the uncertified Form ETA 9089, Application for Permanent Employment Certification. The Director also found that the Petitioner did not establish that the Beneficiary had satisfied one of the three regulatory requirements tor a Schedule A professional nurse. Upon review of the record, including evidence submitted on appeal, we tind that the PWD is valid for the position offered and that the Beneficiary satisfies one of the three regulatory requirements to qualify as a professional nurse. Accordingly, the Petitioner has overcome the Director's decision. ORDER: The appeal is sustained. Cite as Matter of M-R-M-C-P-D-, Inc., ID# 1175999 (AAO May 15, 20 18) β’
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.