sustained EB-3

sustained EB-3 Case: Restaurant

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Restaurant

Decision Summary

The Director initially denied the petition because the petitioner did not establish its ability to pay the proffered wage. On appeal, the petitioner submitted its 2017 federal income tax return showing its net income exceeded the proffered wage, which was sufficient evidence to overcome the grounds for denial.

Criteria Discussed

Ability To Pay The Proffered Wage

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF S-B-, INC. 
APPEAL OF TEXAS SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: MAY31,2018 
PETITION: FORM 1-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER 
The Petitioner, a full service Korean restaurant, seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a kitchen 
assistant. It requests classification of the Beneficiary as an "other worker" under the third preference 
immigrant category. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(3)(A)(iii), 8 U.S.C. 
ยง 1153(B)(3)(A)(iii). This employment-based "EB-3" immigrant classification allows a U.S . 
. employer to sponsor for lawful permanent resident status a foreign national who is capable of 
performing unskilled labor that is not temporary or seasonal in nature and requires less than two 
years of training or experience. 
The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition on the ground that the Petitioner did not 
establish its continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date onward. 
On appeal the Petitioner submits additional evidence and asserts that the evidence of record 
establishes its ability to pay the proffered wage. 
Upon de novo review, we will sustain the appeal. 
A petitioner must establish that it has the ability to pay the beneficiary the pro!Tered wage, as stated 
on the labor certification, from the priority date 1 onward. See 8 C.F.R. ยง 204.5(g)(2). In this case, 
the proffered wage is $16,973 per year, the priority date is May 17, 2017, and the documentation 
submitted on appeal overcomes the Director's ground for denial. Specifically, the Petitioner's 
federal income tax return for 2017 shows that its net income exceeded the proffered wage. 
Accordingly, we find that the Petitioner has established its ability to pay the proffered wage from the 
priority date onward. 
ORDER: The appeal is sustained. 
Cite as Matter of S-B-. Inc., ID# 1430314 (AAO May 31, 20 18) 
1 
The priority date of a petition is the date the underlying labor certification was filed with the Department of Labor. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Use this winning precedent in your petition

MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.

Build Your Winning Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.