dismissed H-1B Case: Accounting
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner, a newly operational car accessory company with no employees and no documented income, failed to establish that the proffered accountant position qualified as a specialty occupation. The AAO concluded that without any business operations or financial information to analyze, the proposed duties did not appear sufficiently complex to require a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty, and the petitioner did not provide sufficient documentary evidence to prove otherwise.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
identifying data deleted to prevent clearly unwmted ,v,ion of pmmal privacy PUBLIC COPY U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Mass Ave., N.W., Rm. A3042 Washington, DC 20529 U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services FILE: SRC 04 156 50670 Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date: MAR 2 2 ?O[#, PETITION: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 10 1 (a)(l S)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1 lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS: This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 9%2d,* 6 Robert P. Wiemann, D. ec Administrative Appeals Office SRC 04 156 50670 Page 2 DISCUSSION: The director of the service center denied the ,nonimmigrant visa petition and the matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be dismissed. The petition will be denied. The petitioner is a car boutique and accessory company. It seeks to employ the beneficiary as an accountant. The petitioner, therefore, endeavors to classify the beneficiary as a nonirnrnigrant worker in a specialty occupation pursuant to section lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1 10 1 (a>( 15)(H>(i>(b>. The director denied the petition on the ground that the proffered position is not a specialty occupation. On appeal, counsel submits a brief and previously submitted evidence. Section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1184(i)(l), defines the term "specialty occupation" as an occupation that requires: (A) theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and (B) attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States. Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), to qualify as a specialty occupation, the position must meet one of the following criteria: (I) A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement for entry into the particular position; (2) The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree; (3) The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or (4) The nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that knowledge required to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) interprets the term "degree" in the criteria at 8 C.F.R. 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to mean not just any baccalaureate or higher degree, but one in a specific specialty that is directly related to the proffered position. The record of proceeding before the AAO contains: (1) Form 1-129 and supporting documentation; (2) the director's request for additional evidence; (3) the petitioner's response to the director's request; (4) the SRC 04 156 50670 Page 3 director's denial letter; and (5) the Form I-290B and supporting documentation. The AAO reviewed the record in its entirety before issuing its decision. The petitioner is seeking the beneficiary's services as an accountant. Evidence of the beneficiary's duties includes: the Form 1-129; the attachments accompanying the Form 1-129; and the petitioner's response to the director's request for evidence. According to this evidence, the beneficiary's proposed duties entail applying principles of accounting to analyze financial information and preparing financial reports; compiling and analyzing financial information to prepare entries to accounts; analyzing financial information detailing assets, liabilities, and capital; preparing the balance sheet, profit and loss statement, and other reports in order to summarize the current and projected financial position. For the proposed position the petitioner seeks to employ the beneficiary, who has the educational equivalent of a bachelor's degree in business administration with a major in accounting. In the denial letter, the director stated that the petitioner filed the instant petition prior to becoming operational: it has no employees, two independent contractors hired on an "as needed" basis, and no evidence of income. Based on this, the director concluded that the proposed duties were not those of an accountant. On appeal, counsel states that the Department of Labor's (DOL) Occupational Outlook Handbook (the Handbook) and the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT) reveal that the proposed position is similar to an accountant, and that accountants have a baccalaureate degree in accounting or a related field. Counsel states that the petitioner's business became operational on March 1, 2004, and the instant petition was filed on May 12, 2004. Counsel maintains that an employer's size or past hiring practices are not relevant in determining whether a position is a specialty occupation. According to counsel, the petitioner needs the services of an accountant. Upon review of the record, the petitioner has established none of the four criteria outlined in 8 C.F.R. $ 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). Therefore, the proposed position is not a specialty occupation. The AAO first considers the criteria at 8 C.F.R. $5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(I) and (2): a baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is the normal minimum requirement for entry into the particular position; a degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations; or a particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree. In determining whether a position qualifies as a specialty occupation, CIS looks beyond the title of the position and determines, from a review of the duties of the position and any supporting evidence, whether the position actually requires the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and the attainment of a baccalaureate degree in a specific specialty as the minimum for entry into the occupation as required by the Act. The AAO often turns to the Handbook for information about the nature and educational requirements of occupations. The Handbook portrays a management accountant as follows: SRC 04 156 50670 Page 4 Management accountants-also called cost, managerial, industrial, corporate, or private accountants-record and analyze the financial information of the companies for which they work. Among their other responsibilities are budgeting, performance evaluation, cost management, and asset management. Usually, management accountants are part of executive teams involved in strategic planning or the development of new products. They analyze and interpret the financial information that corporate executives need in order to make sound business decisions. They also prepare financial reports for other groups, including stockholders, creditors, regulatory agencies, and tax authorities. Within accounting departments, management accountants may work in various areas, including financial analysis, planning and budgeting, and cost accounting. An accountant is a specialty occupation, normally requiring at least a bachelor's degree in accounting or a related discipline. Counsel asserts that the proposed duties parallel those of an accountant; however, the evidence in the record does not support this. The petitioner provided no documentation to establish the complexity of its business operations or its financial transactions, or the handling of many accounts. The Form 1-129 petition shows that the petitioner has no employees and the petitioner does not list a gross annual income. In the August 17, 2004 letter, counsel states that the petitioner became operational in March 2004, and that it uses the services of two independent contractors. Although the petitioner describes the beneficiary as analyzing financial information and preparing financial reports, since the petitioner generated no income, there is no financial information to analyze and no financial reports to prepare. The petitioner must do more than describe the proposed duties. It must provide the supporting documentary evidence that substantiates that the proposed position meets the statutory definition of a specialty occupation, which is employment requiring the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum for entry into the occupation. Simply going on record without supporting documentary evidence is not sufficient for the purpose of meeting the burden of proof in these proceedings. Matter of Sof$ci, 22 I&N Dec. 158, 165 (Comm. 1998) (citing Matter of Treasure Craft of California, 14 I&N Dec. 190 (Reg. Comm. 1972)). With the instant petition, the AAO finds that the petitioner has failed to establish that it has a specialty occupation for which it is seeking the beneficiary's services. The AAO's conclusion, from the evidence to which it has referred, is that the petitioner fails to establish that the beneficiary is coming temporarily to the United States to perform services in a specialty occupation as required by the regulation at 8 C.F.R. fj 214.2(h)(I)(ii)(B)(I). As such, the petitioner satisfies none of the criteria at 8 C.F.R. fj 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A): that a baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent in a specific specialty is the normal minimum requirement for entry into the particular position; a specific degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations; the proffered position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree; the petitioner normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or the nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that the knowledge required to perform them is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree. SRC 04 156 50670 Page 5 As related in the discussion above, the petitioner has failed to establish that the proffered position is a specialty occupation. Accordingly, the AAO shall not disturb the director's denial of the petition on this ground. The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. fj 1361. The petitioner has not sustained that burden. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. The petition is denied.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.