dismissed
H-1B
dismissed H-1B Case: Accounting
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed (rejected) because it concerned the denial of a change of status and extension of stay, not the H-1B petition itself, which was approved. The AAO determined it has no jurisdiction over appeals related to denials of change of status or extension of stay requests. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without addressing the merits of the case.
Criteria Discussed
Jurisdiction Change Of Status Extension Of Stay
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 18407281 Appeal of California Service Center Decision Form 1-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date: SEP. 13, 2021 The Petitioner, an LED lights distributor, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a "staff accountant" under the H-lB nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S .C. § 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The California Service Center Director approved the Form 1-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker, filed on the Beneficiary's behalf, but denied the request to change the Beneficiary's status. The matter is now before us on appeal. We will reject the appeal. Although those seeking H-lB status are currently permitted to file one form to request a petition extension, extension of stay, and change of status, they are still separate determinations. 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(14); 8 C.F.R. § 214.l(c); 8 C.F.R. § 248.3(a); 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(15)(i). Thus, 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(14) deals only with H-lB petition extensions, 8 C.F .R. § 214. l(c) relates solely to extension of stay requests, and 8 C.F.R . § 248 .3(a) addresses change of status requests to H-lB classification. There is no provision in the regulations for an appeal from a denial of a change of status and extension of stay request. See 8 C.F .R. §§ 214.l(c)(5), 248.3(g); see also DHS Delegation Number 0150.1 (effective March 1, 2003); 8 C.F.R. § 2.1 (2003). The authority to adjudicate appeals is delegated to us by the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) pursuant to the authority vested in him through the Homeland Security Act of 2002, Pub. L. 107-296. See DHS Delegation Number 0150.1 (effective March I, 2003); see also 8 C.F.R . § 2.1 (2003). The regulations limit our jurisdiction over petitions for temporary workers to those described under 8 C.F.R. §§ 214 .2 and 214 .6. We therefore have no jurisdiction over this matter and consequently will address neither (1) the Director's determination regarding the Beneficiary's status, nor (2) the claims made on appeal contesting that determination. The Petitioner points to no authority for this office to overturn the Director's denial of the Beneficiary's change of status and extension of stay. As there is no legal basis for our jurisdiction over the Petitioner's requests the appeal must be rejected. ORDER: The appeal is rejected. 2
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.