dismissed H-1B

dismissed H-1B Case: Accounting

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Accounting

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the proffered position of 'budget accountant' qualifies as a specialty occupation. The AAO determined that the petitioner did not prove that the position's duties actually require a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty, which is a fundamental requirement for the H-1B classification. The decision noted that the described duties were not shown to be sufficiently complex and that standard industry references, like the Occupational Outlook Handbook, did not support the petitioner's claim.

Criteria Discussed

A Baccalaureate Or Higher Degree Or Its Equivalent Is Normally The Minimum Requirement For Entry Into The Particular Position The Degree Requirement Is Common To The Industry In Parallel Positions Among Similar Organizations Or, In The Alternative, An Employer May Show That Its Particular Position Is So Complex Or Unique That It Can Be Performed Only By An Individual With A Degree The Employer Normally Requires A Degree Or Its Equivalent For The Position The Nature Of The Specific Duties Is So Specialized And Complex That Knowledge Required To Perform The Duties Is Usually Associated With The Attainment Of A Baccalaureate Or Higher Degree

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rrn. 3000 
Washington, DC 20529 
identifying data deleted to 
prevent clearly unwarranted 
ofprwd privacy 
 U. S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
FILE: WAC 04 246 52353 Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: Df'c 1 $ 201Yj 
PETITION: 
 Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 10 1 (a)(l 5)(H)(i)(b) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 9 '1 lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS : 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
Robert P. Wiemann, Chief 
Administrative Appeals Office 
WAC 04 246 52353 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The director of the California Service Center denied the nonirnrnigrant visa petition and the 
matter is nbw before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be dismissed. The 
petition will be denied. 
The petitioner is an insurance company that seeks to employ the beneficiary as a budget accountant pursuant 
to section lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 
ยง 1 lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b). The director denied the petition based on a determination that the position was not a 
specialty occupation. t 
On appeal, the petitioner asserts, through counsel, that the proffered position's duties are the duties of a 
budget accountant, as set forth in the ~ccu~ational Outlook Handbook (Handbook). The petitioner asserts 
that it has a bona fide need for a budget accountant, and asks that the Form 1-129, Petition for a 
Nonimmigrant Worker (Form 1-129) be approved. 
The record of proceeding before the AAO contains: (1) Form 1-129 and supporting documentation; (2) the 
director's request for additional evidence (RFE); (3) counsel's response to the director's request; (4) the 
director's denial letter; (5) Form I-290B, with counsel's brief, and additional documentation. The AAO 
reviewed the record in its entirety before issuing its decision. 
The issue before the AAO is whether the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation. To meet its 
burden of proof in this regard, the petitioner must establish that the position it is offering to the beneficiary 
meets statutory and regulatory requirements. 
Section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 8 1184(i)(l), dkfines the term "specialty occupation" as an occupation 
that requires: 
(A) 
 theoretical and practical applica'tion of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and 
(B) 
 attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) 
as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States. 
The term "specialty occupation" is further defined at 8 C.F.R. fj 214.2(h)(4)(ii) as: 
An occupation which requires theoretical and practical application of a body of highly 
specialized knowledge in fields of human endeavor including, but not limited to, architecture, 
engineering, mathematics, physical sciences, social sciences, medicine and health, education, 
business specialties, accounting, law, theology, and the arts, and which requires the 
attainment of a bachelor's degree or higher in a specific specialty, or its equivalent, as a 
minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States. 
Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. fj 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), to qualify as a specialty occupation, the position must meet one of 
the following criteria: 
(I) 
 A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum 
requirement for entry into the particular position; 
WAC 04 246 52353 
Page 3 
. (2) 
 The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among 
similar organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its particular 
position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a 
degree; 
(3) 
 The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or 
(4) 
 The nature of. the specific duties is so specialized and complex that knowledge 
required to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a 
baccalaureate or higher degree. 
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) interprets the term "degree" in the above criteria to mean 
not just any baccalaureate or higher degree, but one in a specific specialty that is directly related to the 
proffered position. See 8 C.F.R. 
 2 14.2(h)(4)(ii). 
In order to determine whether a particular job qualifies as a specialty occupation, CIS does not simply rely on 
a position's title. The specific duties of the proffered position, combined with the nature of the petitioning 
entity's business operations, are factors to be considered. CIS must examine the ultimate employment of the 
alien, and determine whether the position qualifies as a specialty occupation. CJ Defensor v. Meissner, 201 
F. 3d 384 (5th Cir. 2000). The critical element is not the title of the position nor an employer's self-imposed 
standards, but whether the position actually requires the theoretical and practical application of a body of 
highly specialized knowledge, and the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree in the specific specialty 
as the minimum for entry into the occupation, as required by the Act. 
In the present matter, the petitioner asserts that it seeks the beneficiary's services as a budget accountant on a 
part-time temporary basis. Evidence of the beneficiary's duties includes: the Form 1-129 and letter of 
support, and the petitioner's response to the director's RFE containing a description of the petitioner's 
business and a description of the proffered position duties and responsibilities. As described by the petitioner, 
the proffered position would require the beneficiary to do cash management (40% of the time), budget 
analysis (40% of the time), and controlling activities (20% of the time). Specifically, the position would 
require the beneficiary to perform the following duties: 
(Cash management) 
Conduct analysis of information affecting investment or resource allocation programs of 
company; 
Analyze financial information to forecast business, industry and economic conditions; 
Develop, maintain and analyze operational and statistical data; 
Prepare and analyze quarterly forecasts and an annual plan. 
(Budget analysis) 
Establish economic objectives; 
Evaluate expenditures and develop budgetary forecasts; 
Compile and analyze business unit plan, plan updates, strategic plan and profit and loss 
statements; 
Forecast monthly and annual revenue and expense budgets for all operations. 
(Controlling activities) 
WAC 04 246 52353 
Page 4 
Keep abreast of current management accounting practice within and outside the insurance 
sector; 
Receive phone calls from customers requesting explanations and pro-rated figures on 
insurance bills. 
To make its determination whether the employment described qualifies as a specialty occupation, the AAO 
turns first to the criteria at 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(I) and (2): a baccalaureate or higher degree or its 
equivalent is the normal minimum requirement for entry into the particular position; and a degree requirement 
2 is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations or a particular position is so 
complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree. Factors considered by the 
AAO when determining these criteria include: whether the Handbook, on which the AAO routinely relies for 
the educational requirements of particular occupations, reports that the industry requires a degree; whether the 
industry's professional association has made a degree a minimum entry requirement; and whether letters or 
affidavits from firms or individuals in the industry attest that such firms "routinely employ and recruit only 
degreed individuals." See Shanti, Inc. v. Reno, 36 F. Supp. 2d 115 1, 1 165 (D. Minn. 1999) (quoting 
Hird/Blaker Corp. v. Suva, 712 F. Supp. 1095, 1102 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)). 
The director found that the proffered position's duties as described by the petitioner were closely related to 
the duties of a specialty occupation, budget analyst. The director found, however, that the petitioner had 
failed to establish that its business would utilize the beneficiary in a budget analyst or a budget accountant 
capacity. The petitioner asserts that the proffered position duties are those of a budget accountant, and not 
those of a budget analyst, and the petitioner asserts that it has a bona fide need for a budget accountant. To 
determine whether the duties of the proffered position support the petitioner's characterization of its 
employment, the AAO turns to the 2006-2007 edition of the Handbook for its discussion of budget analysts 
and accountants. The Handbook provides on page 77, that: 
In private sector firms, a budget analyst examines budgets and seeks new ways to improve 
efficiency and increase profits. . . . Budget analysts have many responsibilities in these 
organizations, but their primary task is providing advice and technical assistance in the preparation 
of annual budgets. . . . Analysts examine the budget estimates or proposals for completeness; 
accuracy; and conformance with established procedures, regulations, and organizational 
objectives. Sometimes, they employ cost-benefit analysis to review financial requests, assess 
program tradeoffs, and explore alternative funding methods. They also examine past and current 
budgets and research economic and financial developments that affect the organization's 
spending. 
The Handbook does not contain a description for a budget accountant. The discussion on management 
accountants, contained on page 70 of the Handbook provides, however, that: 
Management accountants - also called cost, managerial, industrial, corporate, or private 
accountants - record and analyze the financial information of the companies for which they 
work. ~rnon~ their other responsibilities are budgeting, performance evaluation, cost 
management, and asset management. Usually, management accountants are part of executive 
teams involved in strategic planning or the development of new products. They analyze and 
WAC 04 246 52353 
Page 5 
interpret the financial information that corporate executives need in order to make sound 
business decisions. They also prepare financial reports for other groups, including 
stockholders, creditors, regulatory agencies, and tax authorities. Within accounting 
departments, management accountants may work in various areas, including financial 
analysis, planning and budgeting, and cost accounting. 
The Handbook states on page 71 that most accountant positions require at least a bachelor's degree in 
accounting or a related field. However, the Handbook's discussion of the occupation of accountants on page 
72 additionally reflects that accounting positions may be filled by individuals holding associate degrees or 
certificates, or who have acquired their accounting expertise through experience: 
Capable accountants and auditors may advance rapidly; those having inadequate academic 
preparation may be assigned routine jobs and find promotion difficult. Many graduates of 
junior colleges or business or correspondence schools, as well as bookkeepers and accounting 
clerks who meet the education and experience requirements set by their employers, can 
obtain junior accounting positions and advance to positions with more responsibilities by 
demonstrating their accounting skills on the job. 
Further proof of the range of academic backgrounds that may prepare an individual for accounting 
employment is provided by the credentialing practices of the Accreditation Council for Accountancy and 
Taxation (ACAT), an independent accrediting and monitoring organization affiliated with the National 
Society of Accountants. The ACAT does not require a degree in accounting or a related specialty to issue a 
credential as an Accredited Business Accountant@ /Accredited Business Advisor@ (ABA). Eligibility for the 
eight-hour comprehensive examination for the ABA credential requires only three years of "verifiable 
experience in accounting, taxation, financial services, or other fields requiring a practical and theoretical 
knowledge of the subject matter covered on the ACAT Comprehensive Examination." Up to two of the 
required years of work experience may be satisfied through college credit.' 
The AAO finds the discussion on management accountants to be generally reflected in the petitioner's 
description of the proffered position duties. Nevertheless, the AAO finds that the duties of the proffered 
position as listed by the petitioner, are generic and provide no meaningful description of the specific tasks that 
the beneficiary would perform for the petitioner on a daily basis. The same lack of specificity is found in the 
petitioner's response to the director's request for evidence, and in the information submitted on appeal. 
The AAO requires information about the specific duties of a proffered position in the context of the 
petitioning entity's business operations, in order to make a determination regarding the nature of that position 
and its degree requirements, if any. In the present matter, the record fails to offer a detailed, meaningful 
description of the proffered position, or of the beneficiary's duties as they relate to the petitioner's business. 
The AAO finds that the organizational structure, and financial and tax information contained in the record fail 
to establish that the proffered accounting position would require a degreed budget accountant. 
 , 
' Information provided by the ACAT website (ht~://www.acatcredentials.ordindex.html). The Handbook 
identifies the ACAT website as one of several "Sources of Additional Information" at the end of its 
discussion of the occupation of accountants. 
WAC 04 246 52353 
Page 6 
While the size of a petitioner's business is normally not a factor in determining the nature of a proffered 
position, both level of income and organizational structure are appropriately reviewed when a petitioner seeks 
to employ an H-1B worker as an accountant. In cases where a petitioner's business is relatively small, the 
MO reviews the record for evidence that its operations, are, nevertheless, of sufficient complexity to indicate 
that it would employ the beneficiary in an accounting position requiring a level of financial knowledge that 
may be obtained only through a baccalaureate degree in accounting or its equivalent. 
The petitioner indicated at the time of filing that it operates an insurance company, that it employs three 
employees, and that it has a gross annual revenue of $750,000. The MO has reviewed the petitioner's 
financial, tax and organizational structure evidence to determine whether the proffered employment described 
by the petitioner would impose a degree requirement on the beneficiary. 
The Form 1-129 indicates that the company had three employees and a gross income of $750,000, as of 
September 2004. The petitioner's annual federal employment tax return indicates that the petitioner paid 
$102,609 in wages in 2004, and'had three employees as of December 3 1,2004. The 2002 federal tax return 
indicates gross receipts of $285,322. No evidence of record establishes the petitioner's stated gross income of 
$750,000. The petitioner states that it represents the third largest insurer in the United States, Farmer's 
Insurance, yet no evidence of record establishes this relationship or describes the complexity of the financial 
transactions arising out of such representation. The petitioner describes the lines of insurance and financial 
services offered by Farmer's Insurance, but the evidence of record does not establish the duties of the 
proposed budget accountant position in relation to the petitioner's provision of services. 
The evidence fails to verify that the petitioner has a four person staff, the job duties of the staff, or that the 
petitioner has a financial operations division. In spite of the petitioner's assertions on appeal, the present 
record contains no evidence to establish or indicate that the beneficiary would work with financial accounting 
employees or with an accounting department. The information contained in the record reflects that the 
petitioner's company employs only three employees and that the company has two independent, commission 
only employees. The record contains no information to reflect that the employees have financially related 
position titles or duties, and the record does not contain independent information relating to the employee or 
organizational structure of the petitioner's company. 
Going on record without supporting documentation is not sufficient to meet the burden of proof in these 
proceedings. Matter of Soffici, 22 I&N Dec. 158, 165 (Cornm. 1998) (citing Matter of Treasure Craft of 
California, 14 I&N Dec. 190 (Reg. Comm. 1972)). Moreover, the assertions of counsel do not constitute 
evidence. Matter of Obaigbena, 19 I&N Dec. 533, 534 (BIA 1988); Matter of Laureano, 19 I&N Dec. 1 
(BIA 1983); Matter of Ramirez-Sanchez, 17 I&N Dec. 503, 506 (BIA 1980). In the present matter, the record 
lacks evidence to support the contention that the extent or complexity of the petitioner's financial operations 
establishes the need for an accountant with a level of knowledge that may only be obtained through a 
baccalaureate degree in accountaicy. 
Accordingly, the MO finds that the petitioner has failed to establish that the proffered position is a specialty 
occupation under the criterion at 8 C.F.R. 9 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(I), which requires that a baccalaureate or 
higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement for entry into the particular position. 
See Defensor v. Meissner, 201 F. 3d 384 (5th Cir. 2000). 
WAC 04 246 52353 
Page 7 
The AAO finds that the petitioner has also failed to establish that the proffered position qualifies as a 
specialty occupation under 8 C.F.R. 8 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(2), which states that a "[dlegree requirement is 
common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations or, in the alternative, an employer 
may show that its particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual 
with a degree." The record contains no parallel position or common industry evidence. The record also 
contains no ~nformation from a professional association in the petitioner's industry, or letters or affidavits 
from firms or individuals in the industry attesting to the educational requirements of the proffered,position. 
Moreover, the relevant educational requirement information contained in the Handbook and as reflected on 
the ACAT website, indicates that, depending on the needs of the employer, the educational requirement for an 
accountant position ranges from an associate degree or certificate requirement, to a requirement for a 
bachelor's degree in accounting or a related field. The petitioner has failed to provide evidence containing a 
detailed description of the job duties for the proffered position in relation to its business interests. 
Accordingly, the petitioner has failed to establish the company's position needs, or the education level 
required to fill the position requirements. 
The petitioner has additionally failed to establish that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation 
under the third prong of 8 C.F.R. 8 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), which states that, "the employer normally requires a 
degree or its equivalent for the position." The petitioner stated on appeal that the proffered position is a new 
position. Accordingly, the record contains no evidence relating to the petitioner's past hiring practices for the 
proffered position. The petitioner therefore failed to establish that the position is a specialty occupation 
pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 3 2 14.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(3). 
The record also fails to establish that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation under 8 C.F.R. 
8 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(4), which states that, "the nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that 
knowledge required to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or 
higher degree." As previously discussed, the description of the proffered position duties is too generic to 
determine the specific tasks that the beneficiary would perform on a daily basis. This generic description 
makes it impossible to assess whether the proffered position's duties meet the specialized and complex 
threshold of the fourth criterion contained in 8 C.F.R. 8 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). Moreover, as noted above, the 
Handbook and the information on the ACAT website reflects that an accountant position may require less 
than a baccalaureate degree in a specific field to perform the duties. The petitioner has provided no context or 
description of the specific tasks to be performed by the beneficiary, and the record contains no evidence to 
establish any specialized and complex nature of those tasks. Accordingly, the petitioner has failed to 
demonstrate that the profferediposition is a specialty occupation under the requirements at 8 C.F.R. tj 
2 14.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(4). 
Based on the above discussion, the AAO finds that the petitioner has failed to establish that the proffered 
position meets any of the requirements of a specialty occupation as set forth in section 241 of the Act, and at 8 
C.F.R. 8 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). 
The'burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 
8 1361. The petitioner has not sustained its burden. The appeal will therefore be dismissed and the petition 
denied. 
WAC 04 246 52353 
Page 8 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. The petition is denied. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.