dismissed H-1B

dismissed H-1B Case: Catering Management

📅 Date unknown 👤 Company 📂 Catering Management

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the proffered position of catering manager qualifies as a specialty occupation. The AAO, citing the Department of Labor's Occupational Outlook Handbook, concluded that a bachelor's degree in a specific field is not a normal minimum requirement for food service managers. The petitioner did not prove that the position was uniquely complex, that a degree was an industry standard, or that the petitioner itself normally required a degree for the role.

Criteria Discussed

A Baccalaureate Or Higher Degree Or Its Equivalent Is Normally The Minimum Requirement For Entry Into The Particular Position The Degree Requirement Is Common To The Industry In Parallel Positions Among Similar Organizations Or The Position Is So Complex Or Unique That It Can Be Performed Only By An Individual With A Degree The Employer Normally Requires A Degree Or Its Equivalent For The Position The Nature Of The Specific Duties Is So Specialized And Complex That Knowledge Required To Perform The Duties Is Usually Associated With The Attainment Of A Baccalaureate Or Higher Degree

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
PlJBLTCCOpy
identifyingdaUtdeletedto
preventclearlyunwarranted
lnvaslon of personalprivacy
U.s. Department of Homeland Security
20 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Rm. 3000
Washington, DC 20529
u.s.Citizenship
and Immigration
Services
FILE: EAC 04 12754101 Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: JUL 31 2006
INRE: Petitioner:
Beneficiary:
PETITION: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.c. § 1l01(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b)
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:
INSTRUCTIONS:
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All materials have been returned
to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office.
~d~r~..ay/
~ Robert P. Wiemann, }thief
Administrative Appeals Office
www.uscis.gov
EAC 04 12754101
Page 2
DISCUSSION: The service center director denied the nonimmigrant visa petition. The matter is now on
appeal before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO). The appeal will be dismissed. The petition will be
denied.
The petitioner is a provider of various real property and business-related services. It seeks to employ the
beneficiary as its catering manager and to continue her classification as a nonimmigrant worker in a
specialty occupation pursuant to section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the
Act), 8 U.S.c. § 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b).
The director denied the petition on the ground that the record failed to establish that the proffered position
qualifies as a specialty occupation.
Section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.c. § 1184(i)(I), defines the term "specialty occupation" as an
occupation that requires:
(A) theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge,
and
(B) attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its
equivalent) as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States.
As provided in 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), to qualify as a specialty occupation the position must meet
one of the following criteria:
(1) A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum
requirement for entry into the particular position;
(2) The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among
similar organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its
particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an
individual with a degree;
(3) The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or
(4) The nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that knowledge
required to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a
baccalaureate or higher degree.
Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) interprets the term "degree" in the criteria at 8 c.F.R.
§ 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to mean not just any baccalaureate or higher degree, but one in a specific specialty
that is directly related to the proffered position.
The record of proceeding before the AAO contains: (1) Form 1-129 and supporting documentation; (2)
the director's request for evidence (RFE); (3) the petitioner's response to the RFE; (4) the director's
decision; and (5) Form 1-290B, an appeal brief, and supporting materials. The AAO reviewed the record
in its entirety before issuing its decision.
EAC 04 12754101
Page 3
The petitioner describes itself as a company engaged in purchasing and selling, as well as a broad range
of other dealings with, real estate and business properties. The petitioner states that it was established in
2000, had either four employees (according to the Form 1-129) or ten employees (according to an
accompanying letter) at the time of filing, and has a gross annual income of $400,000. The petitioner
indicates that it created a catering department in 2003 to serve its clientele of African emigres, and
proposes to hire the beneficiary as its catering manager for three years at an annual salary of $35,000.
The petitioner provides the following brief description of the position:
[The beneficiary] will directly advise the president, supervise and coordinate the day-to­
day activities of the catering division of [the petitioner]. She will perform such
management functions as budgeting and accounting, as well as give a new sense of
direction to the catering division, using her experience and knowledge in African cuisine.
She will also carry out such other duties as the requirement of the position will demand.
According to the petitioner, a baccalaureate degree and/or requisite experience in catering management or
a related field is required to perform the duties of the job. The beneficiary is qualified for the position,
the petitioner declares, by virtue of her bachelor of science degree in 1999 from the Open University in
the United Kingdom. According to a credentials evaluation report in the record, the beneficiary's
education is equivalent to a bachelor's degree in social sciences from an accredited college or university
in the United States.
In his decision the director determined that the duties of the proffered position parallel those of a food
services manager, as described in the Department of Labor (DOL)'s Occupational Outlook Handbook
(Handbook), an occupation which the Handbook indicates does not normally require a baccalaureate or
higher degree in social sciences, culinary arts, or any other specific specialty. The director was not
persuaded by the evidence of record that the proffered position involves a level of complexity,
uniqueness, or specialization that requires a bachelor's degree in a specific field of study and the
theoretical and practical application of highly specialized knowledge. The record did not show that there
is a common industry standard requiring a specialty degree for catering manager positions, the director
declared, or that the petitioner normally requires a specialty degree for the proffered position. The
director concluded that the evidence of record failed to establish that the proffered position qualifies as a
specialty occupation under any of the criteria enumerated at 8 c.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A).
On appeal counsel asserts that the petitioner's catering manager is a highly skilled position that requires a
professional with at least a bachelor's degree. Counsel reiterates the petitioner's contention that the
position requires a degree and/or requisite experience in catering management or a related field, and that
the beneficiary's degree in social sciences - because of its interdisciplinary nature - is one such field.
The duties of the proffered position are so specialized and complex, counsel maintains, that baccalaureate
level knowledge is required to perform them.
In determining whether a position meets the statutory and regulatory criteria of a specialty occupation,
CIS routinely consults the DOL Handbook as an authoritative source of information about the duties and
educational requirements of particular occupations. Factors typically considered are whether the
Handbook indicates a degree is required by the industry; whether the industry's professional association
has made a degree a minimum entry requirement; and whether letters or affidavits from firms or
EAC 04 12754101
Page 4
individuals in the industry attest that such firms "routinely employ and recruit only degreed individuals."
See Shanti, Inc. v. Reno, 36 F.Supp. 2d 1151, 1165 (D.Minn. 1999) (quoting Hird/Blaker Corp. v. Sava,
764 F.Supp. 1095, 1102 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)). CIS also analyzes the specific duties and complexity of the
position at issue, with the Handbook's occupational descriptions as a reference, as well as the petitioner's
past hiring practices for the position. See Shanti, Inc. v. Reno, id., at 1165-66.
In accord with the director's decision, the AAO determines that the duties of the proffered position are
subsumed in the Handbook's occupational category of food services manager. The duties of the
occupation are described as follows in the Handbook, 2006-07 edition, at 45:
Food service managers are responsible for the daily operations of restaurants and other
establishments that prepare and serve meals and beverages to customers. Besides
coordinating activities among various departments, such as kitchen, dining room, and
banquet operations, food service managers ensure that customers are satisfied with their
dining experience. In addition, they oversee the inventory and ordering of food,
equipment, and supplies and arrange for the routine maintenance and upkeep of the
restaurant, its equipment, and facilities. Managers generally are responsible for all of the
administrative and human-resource functions of running the business, including
recruiting new employees and monitoring employee performance and training.
With regard to the educational requirements for food service managers, the Handbook states as follows:
Experience in the food services industry, whether as a full-time waiter or waitress or as a
part-time or seasonal counter attendant, is essential training for a food services manager.
Many food service management companies and national or regional restaurant chains
recruit management trainees from two- and four-year college hospitality management
programs which require internships and real-life experience to graduate. Some restaurant
chains prefer to hire people with degrees in restaurant and institutional food service
management, but they often hire graduates with degrees in other fields who have
demonstrated experience, interest and aptitude ....
A bachelor's degree in restaurant and food service management provides particularly
strong preparation for a career in this occupation .... For those not interested in pursuing
a four-year degree, community and junior colleges, technical institutes, and other
institutions offer programs in the field leading to an associate degree or other formal
certification ....
Id. at 46-47. What the Handbook makes clear is that, even if many food service managers have
baccalaureate degrees in hospitality management, there is ample opportunity to enter the occupation with
credentials short of a four-year baccalaureate degree in a specific specialty. Accordingly, the catering
manager position at issue in this petition does not meet the first alternative criterion of a specialty
occupation, at 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(1), because a baccalaureate or higher degree in a specific
specialty is not the normal minimum requirement for entry into the position.
As for the second alternative criterion of a specialty occupation, at 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(2), the
record includes two internet job announcements - one from a catering company seeking a catering event
EAC 04 127 54101
Page 5
manager and the other from Larry Flynt's Hustler Club seeking a manager. Neither of these companies is
in the same line of business as the petitioner and the job advertisements provide no information as to their
size and scale of operations relative to the petitioner. Moreover, the second advertisement does not
describe the position as that of a catering manager. While both advertisements indicate that a bachelor's
degree is required for the position, neither state that it must be in a specific specialty. The AAO
determines that the internet job announcements are not persuasive evidence that a bachelor's degree
requirement in a specific specialty is common to the petitioner's industry in parallel positions among
similar organizations, as required for the proffered position of catering manager to qualify as a specialty
occupation under the first prong of 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(2).
Nor does the record establish that the catering manager position is so complex or unique that it can only
be performed by an individual with a baccalaureate degree in a specific specialty, as required for the
position to qualify as a specialty occupation under the second prong of 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(2).
While the position clearly requires knowledge of African cuisine and experience in its preparation and
cooking, the record does not show that such knowledge and experience requires an academic degree of
any nature, much less one in a specific specialty.
With respect to the third alternative criterion of a specialty occupation, the proffered position is newly
created and the petitioner has no hiring history for it. Accordingly, the petitioner cannot demonstrate that
it normally requires a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty or its equivalent for the position, as
required for it to qualify as a specialty occupation under 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(3). Moreover, the
petitioner stated in its initial letter to the service center that a "baccalaureate degree and/or requisite
experience in catering management" is required for the position. (Emphasis added.) This statement
indicates that the petitioner would accept relevant experience in lieu of a degree, and not require that the
experience be equivalent to a baccalaureate degree.
As for the fourth alternative criterion of a specialty occupation, at 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(4), the
record does not establish that the specific duties of the catering manager position are so specialized and
complex that the knowledge required to perform them is usually associated with a baccalaureate or higher
degree. The duties of the position are those of a food services manager, an occupation which the
Handbook indicates does not require baccalaureate level knowledge in a specific specialty. Though
knowledge of African cuisine is required to perform the duties of the job, and distinguishes the proffered
position from that of other catering managers, the evidence of record does not show that such knowledge
is associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate degree in a specific specialty. Furthermore, while the
job may include some budgeting and accounting functions, there is no evidence that they exceed the
managerial competence of a food services manager or that they require baccalaureate level knowledge in
a specific specialty. Thus, the proffered position does not meet the fourth alternative criterion of a
specialty occupation at 8 c.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(4).
For the reasons discussed above, the petitioner has failed to demonstrate that its catering manager position
meets any of the criteria enumerated in 8 c.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to qualify as a specialty occupation.
The record does not establish that the beneficiary will be coming temporarily to the United States to
perform services in a specialty occupation, as required under section 101(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b) of the Act,
8 U.S.c. § 1l01(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b).
EAC 0412754101
Page 6
Finally, if the previous petition granting the beneficiary H-lB classification, which was filed by another
company, was based on similar evidence to that submitted in this proceeding, the approval would have
been erroneous. The AAO is not bound by a decision issued by a service center or a district director, see
Louisiana Philharmonic Orchestra v. INS, 2000 WL 282785 (E.D. La.), aff'd 248 F.3d 1139 (5th Cir.
2001), cert. denied, 122 S.Ct. 51 (2001), and is not required to approve a petition when eligibility has not
been demonstrated merely because of a prior approval that may have been erroneous. See, e.g., Matter of
Church Scientology International, 19 I&N Dec. 593, 597 (Comm. 1988). Each nonimmigrant petition is
a separate proceeding with a separate record. See 8 c.F.R. § 103.8(d). In making a determination of
statutory eligibility, CIS is limited to the information contained in the petitioner's record of proceeding.
See 8 c.F.R. § 103.2(b)(16)(ii). For the reasons previously discussed, the record of proceeding in this
petition does not establish that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation.
The petitioner bears the burden of proof in these proceedings. See section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.c. § 1361.
The petitioner has not sustained that burden. Accordingly, the AAO will not disturb the director's decision
denying the petition.
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. The petition is denied.
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.