Dismissed
H-1B
H-1B Dismissed โ Ceramics Manufacturing (2005): did not establish the beneficiary was eligible for an H-1B
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to prove the beneficiary was eligible for an H-1B extension beyond the standard six-year limit. The petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that a qualifying labor certification (Form ETA-750) or immigrant petition (Form I-140) had been pending for the required 365 days as stipulated by the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act (AC-21).
Criteria Discussed
H-1B Six-Year Limit Ac-21 Extension Eligibility Timely Filing
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more H-1B decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ