dismissed H-1B

dismissed H-1B Case: Computer Science

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Computer Science

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed as moot. The AAO found that because the beneficiary had already been approved for H-1B employment with a different petitioner after the instant petition was filed, further pursuit of the appeal was unnecessary.

Criteria Discussed

Specialty Occupation

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
MATTER OF P-R-I-, INC. 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: OCT. 1, 2015 
APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
PETITION: FORM 1-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER 
The Petitioner, a "Computer consulting services" firm, wishes to employ the Beneficiary in what it 
designates as a "Programmer Analyst (Computer Programming)" position and seeks to classify him 
as a nonimmigrant worker in a specialty occupation. See section 10l(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The Director, 
California Service Center, denied the petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. The appeal 
will be dismissed. 
The instant visa petition was submitted on April 2, 2014. The Director denied the petition, finding 
the evidence insufficient to establish that the proffered position qualifies for classification as a 
specialty occupation position. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that the Director's basis for denial 
was erroneous and contends that it satisfied all evidentiary requirements. 
A review of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) records indicates that on October 7, 
2014, a date subsequent to the filing of the instant petition, another employer filed a Form 1-129 
petition seeking nonimmigrant H-lB classification on behalf of the Beneficiary. USCIS records 
further indicate that this other employer's petition was approved on October 29, 2014. Because the 
Beneficiary in the instant petition has been approved for H-lB employment with another petitioner, 
further pursuit of the matter at hand is moot. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. 
Cite as Matter of P-R-1-, Inc., ID# 14544 (AAO Oct. 1, 2015) 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.